BTR-80A

[Əbülfəz.Elçibəy]

7.0
for rifle proof armor
for heavily handicapped turret with bars blocking its 360 capability
terrible depression since the cutout to on the front is filled
no stabilizer

not to mention it only can kill lightly armored vehicles reliable unless theira bit to close then the gun depression will fail you not to mention the lack of stabilizer


cause it faces tanks that got thick side armor

7.0

[WeebLord69]

Originally posted by ahmed.husanov:

7.0
for rifle proof armor
for heavily handicapped turret with bars blocking its 360 capability
terrible depression since the cutout to on the front is filled
no stabilizer

not to mention it only can kill lightly armored vehicles reliable unless theira bit to close then the gun depression will fail you not to mention the lack of stabilizer


cause it faces tanks that got thick side armor

7.0

gaijijn extra careful because every loser when they get killed by anything russian starts crying russian bias

[The Wang]

5.7 dev server

gaijin-People are complaining, let's give it the APDS belts, but we'll have to move it up because apds would be broken at that br bracket

warthunder players- complain more

[Əbülfəz.Elçibəy]

Originally posted by Weeblord69:

Originally posted by ahmed.husanov:

7.0
for rifle proof armor
for heavily handicapped turret with bars blocking its 360 capability
terrible depression since the cutout to on the front is filled
no stabilizer

not to mention it only can kill lightly armored vehicles reliable unless theira bit to close then the gun depression will fail you not to mention the lack of stabilizer


cause it faces tanks that got thick side armor

7.0

gaijijn extra careful because every loser when they get killed by anything russian starts crying russian bias

calling game bugs bias is kinda delusional no offense

[Əbülfəz.Elçibəy]

Originally posted by The Wang:

5.7 dev server

gaijin-People are complaining, let's give it the APDS belts, but we'll have to move it up because apds would be broken at that br bracket

warthunder players- complain more

i dont read blogs or play the dev server cause i got no time for reading stuff that i dont care about since ik the update is being worked on
seriously first 2 comments are passive aggressive legit no wonder why gaijin can sell 70 euro planes XD

[Cha Cha Real Rough]

Messed around with it a bit, wasn't a fan of it.

Cant really tell ya why its 7.0

[xeon_mlt]

The issue with the USSR Tech tree is that despite there being a lot of vehicles, a lot of them are overtiered for what they face, so the addition of new vehicles is pretty much more of the same.

[Col. Cornbread]

Originally posted by xeon_mlt:

The issue with the USSR Tech tree is that despite there being a lot of vehicles, a lot of them are overtiered for what they face, so the addition of new vehicles is pretty much more of the same.

The tree with the most under br'd vehicles has the most overtiered vehicles?

Just drag the dam thing up, at 8.0 most vehicles have sub 40mm side armor and a lot of the mbts have 80mm or less frontal armor

[Fluffy Pocket Dragon]

Honestly, don't see the issues you folk have. It's one of the few things Russia has that's at an appropriate BR. If you're unhappy about it being at a proper BR, just get the IS6 and continue not having to learn to play the game.

[TaTaTiRa]

I do not know I love them. Two easy kills in one match.

[WeebLord69]

Originally posted by xeon_mlt:

The issue with the USSR Tech tree is that despite there being a lot of vehicles, a lot of them are overtiered for what they face, so the addition of new vehicles is pretty much more of the same.

love my t-34-85 being same br as panther G and Tiger

[Əbülfəz.Elçibəy]

Originally posted by Col. Cornbread:

Originally posted by xeon_mlt:

The issue with the USSR Tech tree is that despite there being a lot of vehicles, a lot of them are overtiered for what they face, so the addition of new vehicles is pretty much more of the same.

The tree with the most under br'd vehicles has the most overtiered vehicles?

Just drag the dam thing up, at 8.0 most vehicles have sub 40mm side armor and a lot of the mbts have 80mm or less frontal armor

i wouldnt mind that if it was stabilized and doesnt have 1mm thin bars blocking the rear of the turret
uptiering it makes it more playable then tbh

[Əbülfəz.Elçibəy]

Originally posted by Fluffy Bucketless Pocket Dragon:

Honestly, don't see the issues you folk have. It's one of the few things Russia has that's at an appropriate BR. If you're unhappy about it being at a proper BR, just get the IS6 and continue not having to learn to play the game.

why even comment here

[Fluffy Pocket Dragon]

Originally posted by ahmed.husanov:

why even comment here

Why even make a thread complaining about the one balanced thing Russia has?

[WeebLord69]

Originally posted by Fluffy Bucketless Pocket Dragon:

Honestly, don't see the issues you folk have. It's one of the few things Russia has that's at an appropriate BR. If you're unhappy about it being at a proper BR, just get the IS6 and continue not having to learn to play the game.

is-6 is trash at 7.0

[Cha Cha Real Rough]

Originally posted by Weeblord69:

Originally posted by Fluffy Bucketless Pocket Dragon:

Honestly, don't see the issues you folk have. It's one of the few things Russia has that's at an appropriate BR. If you're unhappy about it being at a proper BR, just get the IS6 and continue not having to learn to play the game.

is-6 is trash at 7.0

Disagree with IS-6 being trash at 7.0, but BTR-80A at 7.0 is quite bad, I think the BMP-1 at 7.3 is miles better. They should have just put the BTR around ~6.0