BTR-80 at 7.0

[《STATIC》]

Is this a joke? What is an 1985 APC doing at 7.0? That BR is clearly stationed at end of WW2.

Gives us LAV-25 since it's also an 80s vehicle to make it fair then!

[ODINMASTER]

Bro its a vehicle with no armour which is sorta fast with 82mm of max pen at 7.0...... why are you so against this. Its a massive target so its easy to kill

[shipdesignerdude]

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Originally posted by GaijinRuskiHacker:

Are you mentally challenged ?

You compare MBT to IFV

Ok and? Both around the same time , just a few years apart and you mean that the first abrams is at 10.3 while BTR-80A is at 7.0? Give me LAV-25 then , since it's also an APC with 25mm cannon that was made in the 80' same as the BTR-80A

but what do you know , russian player.


ugh



Your only poor counter-argument is to insult this specific person when your poor brain doesn't have nothing else to say. I wouldn't be surprised if you main russian tech tree in the game rn

Can you not grasp the concept that date does not equal performance?

I'd love to see you in the Ikv 72 against my T-44.

You don't understand fundamental balancing.

And as has been mentioned, the new Japanese armored car is likely going to be better in every regard. The BTR is just a huge bus. You're a vehicle the size of the VRCC without a 105.

[《STATIC》]

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

Bro its a vehicle with no armour which is sorta fast with 82mm of max pen at 7.0...... why are you so against this. Its a massive target so its easy to kill

Yes armor it's no problem because I killed one with the 50cals , but the true problem is it's speed , turret firing speed and a bit even it's penetration. There is already an video of one taking down 2 Tiger IIs but that's because the BTR user had brains and giving the fact a vast majority of WT doesn't and they think it's point and click speaks some volumes.

It's not the armor problem. It's everything else about it the problem lmfao. I am still glad they didn't decided to put it at 5.3 back like in the dev build.

[《STATIC》]

Originally posted by shipdesignerdude:

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Ok and? Both around the same time , just a few years apart and you mean that the first abrams is at 10.3 while BTR-80A is at 7.0? Give me LAV-25 then , since it's also an APC with 25mm cannon that was made in the 80' same as the BTR-80A

but what do you know , russian player.


ugh



Your only poor counter-argument is to insult this specific person when your poor brain doesn't have nothing else to say. I wouldn't be surprised if you main russian tech tree in the game rn

Can you not grasp the concept that date does not equal performance?

I'd love to see you in the Ikv 72 against my T-44.

You don't understand fundamental balancing.

And as has been mentioned, the new Japanese armored car is likely going to be better in every regard. The BTR is just a huge bus. You're a vehicle the size of the VRCC without a 105.

My brother in christ. Date does not equal performance? Why would you add an 1985 vehicle at such BR in the first place? Facing against beginning cold war vehicles that are from 50-60s in your damn 80s APC.

Think it like this. M46 for example an 1945 tank with an BR of 7.0 (same as the BTR)


AN 1945 VEHICLE FACING AGAINST AN 1985 VEHICLE

A 1945 BEGINNING OF COLD WAR VEHICLE FACING AN LATER COLD WAR VEHICLE

[ODINMASTER]

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

Bro its a vehicle with no armour which is sorta fast with 82mm of max pen at 7.0...... why are you so against this. Its a massive target so its easy to kill

Yes armor it's no problem because I killed one with the 50cals , but the true problem is it's speed , turret firing speed and a bit even it's penetration. There is already an video of one taking down 2 Tiger IIs but that's because the BTR user had brains and giving the fact a vast majority of WT doesn't and they think it's point and click speaks some volumes.

It's not the armor problem. It's everything else about it the problem lmfao. I am still glad they didn't decided to put it at 5.3 back like in the dev build.

when it was 5.7 it had no apds so its max pen was 65mm. And if you get killed by a btr then its a skill issue. Also people bring the puma to these brs all the time, that thing has an easier time killing tanks than the btr 80 as it has more pen and aphe. So whats your issue?

[《STATIC》]

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Yes armor it's no problem because I killed one with the 50cals , but the true problem is it's speed , turret firing speed and a bit even it's penetration. There is already an video of one taking down 2 Tiger IIs but that's because the BTR user had brains and giving the fact a vast majority of WT doesn't and they think it's point and click speaks some volumes.

It's not the armor problem. It's everything else about it the problem lmfao. I am still glad they didn't decided to put it at 5.3 back like in the dev build.

when it was 5.7 it had no apds so its max pen was 65mm. And if you get killed by a btr then its a skill issue. Also people bring the puma to these brs all the time, that thing has an easier time killing tanks than the btr 80 as it has more pen and aphe. So whats your issue?

Do I really need to record you an damn video of how fast can an BTR-80 kill an T25/T34 to prove it in your face that is actually broken? ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ OSTWIND II has only a bit bigger penetration than the BTR-80 since it's 37mm and can disable me good in the T34/T26

[shipdesignerdude]

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Originally posted by shipdesignerdude:

Can you not grasp the concept that date does not equal performance?

I'd love to see you in the Ikv 72 against my T-44.

You don't understand fundamental balancing.

And as has been mentioned, the new Japanese armored car is likely going to be better in every regard. The BTR is just a huge bus. You're a vehicle the size of the VRCC without a 105.

My brother in christ. Date does not equal performance? Why would you add an 1985 vehicle at such BR in the first place? Facing against beginning cold war vehicles that are from 50-60s in your damn 80s APC.

Think it like this. M46 for example an 1945 tank with an BR of 7.0 (same as the BTR)


AN 1945 VEHICLE FACING AGAINST AN 1985 VEHICLE

A 1945 BEGINNING OF COLD WAR VEHICLE FACING AN LATER COLD WAR VEHICLE

My brother in christ, it is because of performance.

I'm not going to argue with someone who can't understand how the game works. That is for you to figure out.

Also who do you think is going to win? The M46 or the BTR? The M46 will win every time. So lower the BR of the BTR?

I mean the 2.0 Autocannon Puma is better than the BTR. I would take that over the BTR any day if I had it.

[《STATIC》]

Originally posted by GaijinRuskiHacker:

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Idk if you know ... but theres better vehicle at lower br ... its called M53/59 ... and for some reason BTR seems to be way out of place just because it got released almost at the same time as abrams ...

Yeah ofc M53/59 an RUSSIAN AA that is more capable than some tanks and AA at 6.3

[ODINMASTER]

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

when it was 5.7 it had no apds so its max pen was 65mm. And if you get killed by a btr then its a skill issue. Also people bring the puma to these brs all the time, that thing has an easier time killing tanks than the btr 80 as it has more pen and aphe. So whats your issue?

Do I really need to record you an damn video of how fast can an BTR-80 kill an T25/T34 to prove it in your face that is actually broken? ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ OSTWIND II has only a bit bigger penetration than the BTR-80 since it's 37mm and can disable me good in the T34/T26

how is it broken? Everything can kill everything in this game. If you let a btr 80 get close to you then its on you... theres plenty of vehicles like it already in game.

Also the tiger 2 has 80mm of side armour so idk how the btr is penning it unless its at 90 degrees perfectly to the armour, cause any slight angle and its not going through. Same for the rear of the turret.

[《STATIC》]

Originally posted by shipdesignerdude:

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

My brother in christ. Date does not equal performance? Why would you add an 1985 vehicle at such BR in the first place? Facing against beginning cold war vehicles that are from 50-60s in your damn 80s APC.

Think it like this. M46 for example an 1945 tank with an BR of 7.0 (same as the BTR)


AN 1945 VEHICLE FACING AGAINST AN 1985 VEHICLE

A 1945 BEGINNING OF COLD WAR VEHICLE FACING AN LATER COLD WAR VEHICLE

My brother in christ, it is because of performance.

I'm not going to argue with someone who can't understand how the game works. That is for you to figure out.

Also who do you think is going to win? The M46 or the BTR? The M46 will win every time. So lower the BR of the BTR?

I mean the 2.0 Autocannon Puma is better than the BTR. I would take that over the BTR any day if I had it.

Uh do I need to tell you the M46 has way less armor than the T34? And I was able to be disabled pretty quick by an putrid camping BTR-80 from far away in some bushes.

If the BTR-80 aint aware of you , ofc you can kill it. I recently killed one with 50 cals but if you arent aware of it? Complete doom. Before you can even respond it already ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up your tracks , engine and cannon


Ofc you ain't gonna argue with me since you don't have any other arguments you can say against me. The BR system is a mess

[Illusionyary]

Probably something that should have never been added, or only as an event vehicle or something, despite how iconic it is vehicles like this just ruin any immersion left in this game.

[《STATIC》]

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Do I really need to record you an damn video of how fast can an BTR-80 kill an T25/T34 to prove it in your face that is actually broken? ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ OSTWIND II has only a bit bigger penetration than the BTR-80 since it's 37mm and can disable me good in the T34/T26

how is it broken? Everything can kill everything in this game. If you let a btr 80 get close to you then its on you... theres plenty of vehicles like it already in game.

Also the tiger 2 has 80mm of side armour so idk how the btr is penning it unless its at 90 degrees perfectly to the armour, cause any slight angle and its not going through. Same for the rear of the turret.

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Do I really need to record you an damn video of how fast can an BTR-80 kill an T25/T34 to prove it in your face that is actually broken? ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ OSTWIND II has only a bit bigger penetration than the BTR-80 since it's 37mm and can disable me good in the T34/T26

how is it broken? Everything can kill everything in this game. If you let a btr 80 get close to you then its on you... theres plenty of vehicles like it already in game.

Also the tiger 2 has 80mm of side armour so idk how the btr is penning it unless its at 90 degrees perfectly to the armour, cause any slight angle and its not going through. Same for the rear of the turret.

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Do I really need to record you an damn video of how fast can an BTR-80 kill an T25/T34 to prove it in your face that is actually broken? ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ OSTWIND II has only a bit bigger penetration than the BTR-80 since it's 37mm and can disable me good in the T34/T26

how is it broken? Everything can kill everything in this game. If you let a btr 80 get close to you then its on you... theres plenty of vehicles like it already in game.

Also the tiger 2 has 80mm of side armour so idk how the btr is penning it unless its at 90 degrees perfectly to the armour, cause any slight angle and its not going through. Same for the rear of the turret.

"Everything can kill everything in this game" An ostwind II capable of killing heavy tanks but m42 can barely penetrate a Tiger E


Edit: Sorry meant tiger E

[《STATIC》]

Originally posted by Illusionyary:

Probably something that should have never been added, or only as an event vehicle or something, despite how iconic it is vehicles like this just ruin any immersion left in this game.

You got a point there and these dudes in here right now are the probably the same dudes that go out there and say "YOU SHOULD PLAY WAR THUNDER IT'S SO REALISTIC AND HISTORICAL ACCURATE"


Meanwhile an 1985 military vehicle facing 1945 vehicle :o

[ODINMASTER]

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

how is it broken? Everything can kill everything in this game. If you let a btr 80 get close to you then its on you... theres plenty of vehicles like it already in game.

Also the tiger 2 has 80mm of side armour so idk how the btr is penning it unless its at 90 degrees perfectly to the armour, cause any slight angle and its not going through. Same for the rear of the turret.

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

how is it broken? Everything can kill everything in this game. If you let a btr 80 get close to you then its on you... theres plenty of vehicles like it already in game.

Also the tiger 2 has 80mm of side armour so idk how the btr is penning it unless its at 90 degrees perfectly to the armour, cause any slight angle and its not going through. Same for the rear of the turret.

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

how is it broken? Everything can kill everything in this game. If you let a btr 80 get close to you then its on you... theres plenty of vehicles like it already in game.

Also the tiger 2 has 80mm of side armour so idk how the btr is penning it unless its at 90 degrees perfectly to the armour, cause any slight angle and its not going through. Same for the rear of the turret.

"Everything can kill everything in this game" An ostwind II capable of killing heavy tanks but m42 can barely penetrate a Tiger E


Edit: Sorry meant tiger E

Whats your point supposed to be? Shocker a vehicle can kill other things at its br. Stop crying, you can literally kill the btr with 50 cals, if you are tunnel visioned and dont notice a btr coming for you then thats your fault. Get good

[《STATIC》]

Originally posted by ODINMASTER:

Originally posted by Mare Gabor:

"Everything can kill everything in this game" An ostwind II capable of killing heavy tanks but m42 can barely penetrate a Tiger E


Edit: Sorry meant tiger E

Whats your point supposed to be? Shocker a vehicle can kill other things at its br. Stop crying, you can literally kill the btr with 50 cals, if you are tunnel visioned and dont notice a btr coming for you then thats your fault. Get good

LMFAO , Bozo jumped all over information I talked about now and all he can say is "Get Good" What a complete joke you are.

"Don't notice a BTR" UHUH ONE WITH BUSHES/IN BUSHES OR BETWEEN TREES FAR AWAY THAT TRAVERSED ALREADY HALF OF THE MAP WHILE OTHERS BARELY GOT OUT OF SPAWN , AN BTR THAT HAS AN CAMOFLAGE perfectly to green environment and can still deal great damage sometimes even to heavy tanks for some reason.

I swear I would insult you so bad right now. Clearly even with enough evidence all you can say is "get good" when there is other problems rather than "But IT'S BARELY HAS ANY ARMOR". I will say it again you are probably this bozo that goes to people saying that this game is historical accurate and fun when it's not.