War Thunder

War Thunder

查看统计:
此主题已被锁定
magazine2  [开发者] 2023 年 8 月 1 日 上午 5:58
7
4
[Feedback] BR changes
最后由 magazine2 编辑于; 2023 年 8 月 2 日 上午 1:00
引用自 magazine2:
Hello! Since the BR changes have been implemented, I'll close this thread. Thanks for your feedback. You can see the final BR table here:

https://steamcommunity.com/games/236390/announcements/detail/3672174440050593741
< >
正在显示第 106 - 120 条,共 259 条留言
LokiTeam 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 12:35 
AirRB needs BR decompression especially from like 8.7 to 10.0
RollClassic 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 12:36 
Just saying, I had to remove my old negative review and leave another one just because of this proposed patch, lmao.
Pyatochek 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 12:37 
Ну чисто улитковские правки, т114 перестала домажить, а ей еще БР поднимают, я ее для чего покупал? Это как то не совсем честно по отношению к игрокам которые донатят.
(Axel) Samurai Whack 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 12:39 
Seems good if all vehicles move up in a equal way and a big enough gap is left to not make mid ww2 stuff meet coldwar stuff all is well!
Hanjo 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 12:43 
Raising the standard of French tanks.
It's a good thing my crew is at 150, otherwise I'd have given up on this tree for good with this nerf.
Mac 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 12:44 
The VL Pyörremyrsky uptier in arcade from 4.3 BR ---> 4.7 BR seems nonsensical to me.

I got the VL Pyörremyrsky from one of the previous Warbond Shops recently and I've used it in maybe a dozen matches or so and honestly I personally was very disappointed with it.

No idea how your stats can possibly say that it needs an uptier. If anything I was already considering removing it from my lineup completely even at 4.3 BR.

I'd much rather fly a BF109 or a Yak or a La at 4.3 BR than the VL Pyörremyrsky.

Maybe I am not seeing something here. Maybe some "tryhards" climbed to 10k altitude every match and did one 10:0 K/D game after another but personally I'd say that plane is average at best at 4.3 BR where it currently sits.
Bot 001 - On laptop 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 12:48 
引用自 RV_770
Implementing +/- 0.7 BR Matchmaking, instead of current +/- 1 BR Matchmaking, is a better solution

No vehicle should have to face an enemy vehicle a Whole BR Higher.. (Especially when grinding Stock Vehicles)

Just replace those two +1 BR Slots per team with 0.7 BR Slots..


Removing the uptier/downtier all together, would be a even greater solution.
Bot 001 - On laptop 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 12:59 
The M60 should stay at 7.7 because I just find that it cannot compete in even slight uptiers due to the lack of a stabilizer, which would then make full uptiers at 9.0 unbearable.

They should just remove uptiers/downtiers in general. No idea why the community hasn't mentioned this more often.
Digod 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 12:59 
引用自 Bot 001 - On laptop
引用自 RV_770
Implementing +/- 0.7 BR Matchmaking, instead of current +/- 1 BR Matchmaking, is a better solution

No vehicle should have to face an enemy vehicle a Whole BR Higher.. (Especially when grinding Stock Vehicles)

Just replace those two +1 BR Slots per team with 0.7 BR Slots..


Removing the uptier/downtier all together, would be a even greater solution.
probably not a viable solution cuz not every BR has plenty of players for wait times to be low, we may see increase for wait time that way for up to 5-10 mins of just waiting for a match and this may cause real damage for the game and profits for gaijin
Digod 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 1:02 
cuz we don't see the whole picture, that's why this solution may not be such a good idea, but still making it not +/-1.0 but a +/- 0.7 BR should be viable for both sides of the argument, both for players to not face way overpowered vehicles against them and for gaijin to maintain their profits and the game itself still be playable in the long run(via low wait time)
Digod 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 1:03 
cuz waiting for a match for up to 10 mins can be way too frustrating for players and they can just leave the game altogether
Obsidianfury 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 1:06 
I think their good changes that need to happen but top tier air needs to have some and so does the 9.0 to 12.0 range for ground and especially cold war vehicles like the is 6 needed to go up and a few of the german and russian vehicles but the t95e1 and the m60 aos and a few other 8.0 american tanks i dont agree with the 8.3 move up
Bot 001 - On laptop 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 1:08 
引用自 pboy77
This is just moving around whats compressed in BR please raise the top BR and let the 8.7 - 9.7 BR breath and not just be food for the supersonic missile slingers. In aircraft at least, this BR is miserable i just want to dogfight in early jets with guns. Being up-tired right now i have slim to none chance at killing a supersonic jet with a jet that can’t go supersonic in a dive and has no missiles. I wish an up-tier would mean i was fighting other non supersonic jets that have maybe 2 aim-9b missiles. Raise top tier to 15 - 16 and let this era of gun fighters have gun fights and let the supersonic missile slingers sling missiles at each other.


YES! I have no idea why I'm fighting vs misile slingers in a G91/3 with no countermeasures or alert. like who in their right mind looked at this and said: yeah this is fine.
Digod 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 1:09 
but the bigger problem is that plenty of players exploit this mechanic to play mostly downtier games, for example if you play a 10.7 setup for realistic tank battles 2 out of 3 games you play in 10.0-10.3 range and viable options would be sweden, usa, ussr e.t.c. and this is a problem, cuz there is a clear difference in m1 abrams vs t80-b and m1 abrams vs t90-a or t80-b vs m1 abrams and t80-b vs IPM1/M1A1
Bot 001 - On laptop 2023 年 8 月 1 日 下午 1:11 
引用自 MashedPotatoww
Finally WW2 seperated from Cold war, a GREAT change. It was impossible to play anything at 6.3 since you always got uptiered 7.3 Germany with vehicles 20 years after 1945...
yup, I hated that so much. 6.3-7.3 was unfair for Germany because of the uptiers.
< >
正在显示第 106 - 120 条,共 259 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

发帖日期: 2023 年 8 月 1 日 上午 5:58
回复数: 259