War Thunder

War Thunder

View Stats:
This topic has been locked
magazine2  [developer] Aug 1, 2023 @ 5:58am
7
4
[Feedback] BR changes
Last edited by magazine2; Aug 2, 2023 @ 1:00am
Originally posted by magazine2:
Hello! Since the BR changes have been implemented, I'll close this thread. Thanks for your feedback. You can see the final BR table here:

https://steamcommunity.com/games/236390/announcements/detail/3672174440050593741
< >
Showing 1-15 of 265 comments
MoH-NatkA Aug 1, 2023 @ 7:34am 
Только начал ADV качать для ВСБ в вилку 10.7(3)-11.3. :steamsad: ГРУСТЬ
Salavatio Huliganio Aug 1, 2023 @ 7:41am 
2
What's the point of decompressing cold war era tanks if it recompresses much bigger bracket of 9.0-11.0?
Couch Goblin Aug 1, 2023 @ 7:42am 
3
2
2
2
So this is basically reverting all the BR changes to 9.7 up that happened a few months ago. Where the turms was at 9.7, leo 2a4, abrams were at 10.0 and got moved up to 10.0 and 10.3. Because they are now going back to vsing those 8.7-9.0 tanks. So the tanks within brackets are going backwards and compression is occurring again. 7.7-8.7 does need a increase in BR, but the high BR tanks should be going up too. Now the 8.7-9.0 tanks are going against the tanks that made that BR hell again, just as it was getting to a better place.
TaxFraudTodd Aug 1, 2023 @ 7:43am 
1
I think raising the ceiling would work better for tanks at those tiers because you start messing with tanks at the 9.0 and 8.7 range so now they can start seeing tanks like the Abrams, or the t80b only loaded with dm23. So have the new top be 12.0 to match with jets and just move everything up by 1 that needs it. That way World war II tanks can only face each other and have all the cold war tanks face each other that can do properly with each other.

For jets I would really like to see decompression around the 8.3 to 9.3 ranges. There are too many powerful supersonics(f104) that face jets that can't even catch it or have any counter to it. So I would like something more similar to the older days of war thunder where the top tier used to be cl13, f2 sabre, hunter and mig17. They didn't face jets that fired 30g missiles like the yak38 or jets that can run away or gain insane alt so quick like the f104.
ADF-11F Aug 1, 2023 @ 7:50am 
Please lower the BR of the R2Y2's at 8.0 You can't do anything, You are way too slow and since the META has changed quite severly at 7.3 or 7.0 they would be good!
Last edited by ADF-11F; Aug 1, 2023 @ 7:52am
Psycho Yuri Aug 1, 2023 @ 7:59am 
Looks good generally. Now I hope one day all cold war tanks will be atleast 6.7 or (preferably) higher. For me that's the BR where world war 2 era ends.
Nhoque Balboa Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:00am 
I didnt like it all but agree with some of the changes.
For example:
9.0 vehicles to 9.3 is great because now they should stop facing 8.0 tanks and killing then like a hot knife cutting a butter.
M3A3 Bradley will suffer in 10.0+ scenario in my oppinion.
Leopard I in 8.0 I dont know we need to test it.
RV_770 Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:00am 
4
4
4
2
Implementing +/- 0.7 BR Matchmaking, instead of current +/- 1 BR Matchmaking, is a better solution

No vehicle should have to face an enemy vehicle a Whole BR Higher.. (Especially when grinding Stock Vehicles)

Just replace those two +1 BR Slots per team with 0.7 BR Slots..
Last edited by RV_770; Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:04am
Legion Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:02am 
Wtf...well there goes my 7.0 line ups for a few nations...
kevinwohlk Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:03am 
There is still the Problem that all the r2y2 are way to high from Br and i hope they get set to 7.0-7.3 #Make.japan.great.again
SailorSloth Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:07am 
the type 59 and the ztz59a did not need a up br change also gaijin are saying they will move the Z-19(E) from 10.3 to 10.7 when they are already 11.0
Last edited by SailorSloth; Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:11am
i drink gasoline Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:08am 
Originally posted by Bucher:
So could you please inform me how the BMP-2M is worse than the Dardo and the VCC 80/30? I'd just like to know how something that has a better main gun, better missiles, lower profile, better thermals, amphibious capable and better supporting line-up gets to skip being raised. Obviously I don't have the brain power to understand this cause I lack the magical rock you seem to bludgeon each other over the head with at GJN studios, so please explain it to me.

wdym the bmp-2m is getting raised too?
FangedDragon Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:14am 
The T29 is the only vehicle I disagree with here, I believe it should stay down at 7.0, or it's counterpart the Tiger II should get raised as well. Feels like an unnecessary nerf to a vehicle that was already performing just fine.
Bucher Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:15am 
Originally posted by luc:

wdym the bmp-2m is getting raised too?

When I checked with CTRL-F BMP it was not there but I guess it is now.
Ice-_- Aug 1, 2023 @ 8:17am 
Originally posted by RV_770:
Implementing +/- 0.7 BR Matchmaking, instead of current +/- 1 BR Matchmaking, is a better solution

No vehicle should have to face an enemy vehicle a Whole BR Higher.. (Especially when grinding Stock Vehicles)

Just replace those two +1 BR Slots per team with 0.7 BR Slots..
+1
< >
Showing 1-15 of 265 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Aug 1, 2023 @ 5:58am
Posts: 265