War Thunder

War Thunder

Ver estadísticas:
hellatze 12 AGO 2016 a las 0:46
so we wont get any large ship and submarine?
am i heard terrible joke from gaijin or something?

tell me its a joke.

if its true then...

sigh.
< >
Mostrando 1-15 de 104 comentarios
hellatze 12 AGO 2016 a las 0:58 
i dont get it.

what is capital ship ? battleship or carrier? is that player controller?

u boat? wtf happend?
hellatze 12 AGO 2016 a las 0:59 
and russian + american released first?

what about japan?

japan tanks?
TaggthemageTTV 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:01 
The capital ship is the Bismark.

But any large ships will be AI controlled while playings are playing in Attack craft, or PT boats it sounds like.

Even Destroyers are a "Maybe" for players to control.

Now CV's just makes sense because planes are controlled by other players.

And manually controlled CV's could lead to horrible horrible trolling

*See an ally plane coming in for a landing, final moments of approach*
*CV throws it into full port/starboard and causes the plane to crash into the Bridge/Tower*

But who knows! Things could change. They might just start out as smaller things and ease into larger ones.
hellatze 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:04 
So german vs russian again?

I have bad premonition in this.

maybe its time to uninstall :(
hellatze 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:04 
5 year wasted for nothing.
kiro the avenger! 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:15 
capital ships are big boys
im not sure if destroyers count, but battleships, cruisers, carriers all that are capital ships

subs we'll never get.
simply modelling sub-surface details would be so much effort
XAP7AS 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:28 
Publicado originalmente por hellatze:
So german vs russian again?

I have bad premonition in this.

maybe its time to uninstall :(

Pretty sure there's an American PT109, so it won't be like the GF Beta.

Seriusly? You're going to uninstall just because a completely new game mode will be launched early 2017... I think it's safe to assume you enjoy the current state, so just keep playing with planes and tanks, noone will pressure you to play ships.

This is a really dumb discussion. I am mean, they made a huge post and answered a ♥♥♥♥ load of questions.

https://warthunder.com/en/news/4185-news-naval-battles-in-war-thunder-closed-beta-test-later-this-year-en/

http://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/326775-large-ship-naval-battles-some-clarification/&page=1
KamiruSan 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:32 
Well they don't wanna to add big ships because of gameplay, they are thinking if they will add bigger ships (CL, CA, BB) the gameplay will be to slow and will take too much time... What a nonsense... Maybe we will see them later but not for now.
Última edición por KamiruSan; 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:36
kiro the avenger! 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:34 
Publicado originalmente por XAP7AS:
Publicado originalmente por hellatze:
So german vs russian again?

I have bad premonition in this.

maybe its time to uninstall :(

Pretty sure there's an American PT109, so it won't be like the GF Beta.

Seriusly? You're going to uninstall just because a completely new game mode will be launched early 2017... I think it's safe to assume you enjoy the current state, so just keep playing with planes and tanks, noone will pressure you to play ships.

This is a really dumb discussion. I am mean, they made a huge post and answered a ♥♥♥♥ load of questions.

https://warthunder.com/en/news/4185-news-naval-battles-in-war-thunder-closed-beta-test-later-this-year-en/

http://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/326775-large-ship-naval-battles-some-clarification/&page=1
they answered most of the questions badly with non-points

i understand that adding player controlled capital ships would not end well, but the excuses they gave were awful
'not all nations had big navies' like they dont have tier 5s?
'we value realism' just lol
'you'll be sailing for hours' and i suppose normal tank battles only took 20mins tops?

real issues are how durable capital ships were, the low manuaverability of ships and sheer amount of systems that normally took thousands to control

honestly if they can make full trees of boats/small ships, im in
but they have to admit its a kick in the teeth for most people and they shouldnt have sprung it on us like this
Última edición por kiro the avenger!; 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:37
BenTheFourFingered 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:45 
I don't like the fact they said that not all nations had big navies. Japan doesnt have a lot of tanks yet they still went ahead with ground forces. I'm disapointed that we won't be getting the really huge ships but it's understandable as matches will take too long or they would have to change the statistics of each ships so they are are horribly unrealistic. Shame but understandable.
Bogey 12 AGO 2016 a las 1:46 
If you want a proper arcade hitpoint based warship game, you already got World of Warships which is a decent enough game. Why should WarThunder be a copy of that?

Hopefully larger ships will be added, but I get the rationale behind their decision so far. There's a reason sims work best with smaller ships, which is why you have successful games like Silent Hunter and no battleship sims to speak of.
hellatze 12 AGO 2016 a las 2:02 
Publicado originalmente por Bogey:
If you want a proper arcade hitpoint based warship game, you already got World of Warships which is a decent enough game. Why should WarThunder be a copy of that?

Hopefully larger ships will be added, but I get the rationale behind their decision so far. There's a reason sims work best with smaller ships, which is why you have successful games like Silent Hunter and no battleship sims to speak of.
jesus.

this is a game is it?
kiro the avenger! 12 AGO 2016 a las 2:03 
Publicado originalmente por hellatze:
Publicado originalmente por Bogey:
If you want a proper arcade hitpoint based warship game, you already got World of Warships which is a decent enough game. Why should WarThunder be a copy of that?

Hopefully larger ships will be added, but I get the rationale behind their decision so far. There's a reason sims work best with smaller ships, which is why you have successful games like Silent Hunter and no battleship sims to speak of.
jesus.

this is a game is it?
a quasi-realistic game, which simply cannot properly represent capital ships that IRL had crews of hundreds, if not thousands.
condensing 5 guys into 1 for a tank is already less than perfect
hellatze 12 AGO 2016 a las 2:04 
Publicado originalmente por kiro the avenger!:
Publicado originalmente por hellatze:
jesus.

this is a game is it?
a quasi-realistic game, which simply cannot properly represent capital ships that IRL had crews of hundreds, if not thousands.
condensing 5 guys into 1 for a tank is already less than perfect
what a pain.

crew could be divided or not show up in the sip. instead replaced by cabins. the crew are shown in numbers.

even destroyer have many crews.
< >
Mostrando 1-15 de 104 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Publicado el: 12 AGO 2016 a las 0:46
Mensajes: 104