Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The premiums are sold, the money is correct. Gaijin is pleased.
Just to send Gaijin the message that it sucks to play in those BR ranges
A-10 is understandable, but the SU-25 is too much for 9.0
Of course the ultimate thing would be BR decompression but yea..
So sabres facing supersonic jets and all aspect 30g missles is historically accurate?
Not a historian but no I wouldn't think so, then again neither is any Swedish plane facing any plane at all. Never claimed everything was 100% but in regards to if model x can get component y or not Gaijin are pretty consistent about requiring evidence that it has basis in reality. And in the end what you're describing is basically just a symptom of BR compression and the matchmaker searching +/-1 of your BR.
There are far more dangerous planes in the 9.3-10.3 air battles. Thanks to br compression. From A-5C (10br premium), F-5C (10.3 premium), Mig-21's (10.3) and Crusaders (10.3).
Even something like F3H-2 (9.3), which is utter trash plane in these battles. But formidable dogfighter in downtiers that you get maybe once a month.
A-10 is 10br now so it's chances of getting a full downtier game is practically zero. And in these 9.3-10.3 battles even low spectrum planes can outplay it, cause of it's sluggish nature. Which makes Su-25 far more dangerous and annoying cause it's not slow like A-10.
But your not wrong in a way. Lot of jets in high tiers are completely unplayble in air battles cause of the vastly superior opponents they face. And to add insult to injury Gaijin is charging 15k silver to repair these trash jets.
It depends. In raw performance, the S is way better (it's a later model from the late 60s, basically what the export MF model is based on.) It lacks in missiles and Countermeasures.
But in countermeasures (if the pilot chooses them) and missiles, the SPS-K is better. But in the end, it's basically a PFM that's the result of a LSK program to allow them to carry R-60s. In game I rarely get a full downtier (but do have to often face a wall of AV-8As and A-10As. Regardless if im at 10.0 or 9.0.)
Should add we are still missing a bit of functionality in the SPS-K (and other -21s with it) in regards to the SPS-141 pod. I have a feeling they'll add it in upcoming updates once they figure out how to work such mechanics. The SPS-K is an oddball. It could move up to 10.3 maybe just due to the R-60s, but it can struggle against many lower planes too. It literally is just a upgraded PFM with better toys (R-60s.)
I think 10.0 is fine for the SPS-K in its current state, but the AV-8A and Su-25s need to come up to 10.0. With their large CM banks and great missiles, along with some positive performance attributes, these have little business in 9.7. Another move up a notch or two should help in the 8.7 to 10.3 bracket right now.