Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
1. In order to snap onto the target, the plane itself has to snap instantly onto the plane in order keep shooting at the lead indicator and beyond.
This is clearly not evident on the biplane shown in 2:41 as the player's having trouble catching it. With aimbot, that certainly wouldn't be the case, even if the plane itself can't make that turn fast enough.
2. 2:24, the player is shooting at the biplane and only scoring hits. With aimbot enabled, if it ever was, the damage would've been much more crucial to the plane (i.e scoring hits to the engine and setting it on fire immediately, or outright killing the pilot)
And this continues to 2:57.... the entire time, legitimately struggling to keep the target on him whilst shooting.
3. 3:48, the player is preemptively shooting at a player, he actually stops shooting midway through despite having the ammo and no overheating, What's worse is that its a Ki-43, a paper plane. Anything with some punch would wreck it. Which is what a Yak has with 20mm cannon.
Player still kills the ki-43, but again, if it was actually aimbot, he obviously didn't need to lead him, stop shooting and change direction. Even though the first volley had very few hits despite the early spray.
4. 3:59, most blatant display of NOT having aimbot. He sprays at the Spitfire but doesnt get the kill despite using ALL his cannon ammo.... and not even a SINGLE critical hit.
Final straw:
4:36....
If he really did have aimbot, why.... WHY THE ♥♥♥♥ IS HE NOT EVEN SHOOTING AT THE PLANE RIGHT IN FRONT OF HIM...
His reticle isn't even on TARGET.
Didn't score even a SINGLE HIT, critical or otherwise...
7:00...
The player legitimately tries to get on target and sprays but it doesn't even connect....
And it occurs throughout the matches............
16:06, he gets into a chaika....... omg...... he's legitimately struggling to keep on target while using whats arguably the best armed biplane in the game with 4 machineguns and what looks to be stealth ammo... he didn't even manage to set the plane on fire...........
I'm sorry OP, but if you're honestly looking on Youtube to hide the fact that you suck behind "hacks" like these, then you're honestly sad.
What's worse is that he isn't even displaying where you can buy or get the hacks in the first place. He doesn't even show his scoreboard at the end.
3 kills to what, 3 deaths is PRETTY AVERAGE (barely breaking even) for someone who supposedly is AIMBOTTING.
It's really saddening that you need to resort to this.... horrendous actually.
I'm sorry again, but I'm all for new players trying to play and learn the game, but players that blame something other than themselves by using this video (and actual players that actually use cheats) in general to defend their inability to adapt.... are toxic.
All you have to do is tell the server that your shots are positive. Even then, answer me this and think about it real hard. How does your packet calculate the lead indicator you see? Leader indicater alters it's distance from the plane in accordance to it's speed. That way you the human can calculate your shots. A computer can do that better and faster.
That's the weak point and that's where you send the false postive hit. That way regardless if you are off mark when aiming at the spot. It will consider it a hit. Simple program can do that. A program that isn't any more advance than a mod for Fallout 4. Best part, half the programmers job is already done in pilot assist and that lead indicator. It's not that hard.
Like I said stop tempting fate. There is a chance a hack like that already exist and has been caught by gajin. Give it time and keep up with this Gajin is unhackable crap you guys keep pushing. And some hacker will get insulted and make one so advance gajin won't catch it without the source code. I never understand why people try to insult hackers by saying they can't hack something. It'll forever be beyond me what excitement you guys get out of tempting fate. But whatever.
Edit: Read a something wrong. My fault. But yes they would keep it hidden. Selling to professional players though... No they would sell to whoever is willing to buy or they would give it out like candy just to prove they can do it.
Regardless of that, it's HIGHLY difficult to actually MAKE an aimbot thats workable in an enviroment with 360degrees of possible movement.
In order for an aimbot to actually exist, it'd have to snap onto the lead indicator, completely bypass how the player's plane functions/moves (even in arcade) and mirror the target's movements completely in of itself to maintain that lead indicator.
What you're basically using is an FPS looking into a lead indicator. Where player movement/view to correspond with the crosshair is entirely dictated by how fast the mouse moves (Which is substituted by the aimbot) but player movement in War Thunder only translates by how fast the *plane* the player moves.
*Not* the player itself, even in Arcade. Get the difference?
Is it possible? I dont know, but I wouldn't venture to say it will NEVER be possible.
Atleast you get the never say it's not possible. That's just inviting hackers to try since they consider such things as insults.
But you aren't looking for the 360 degree enviroment. Just the lead indicator, you use it to give the false positives. While the pilot instuctor gets a nice boost from the programming. Difficult, as in it would take a month or two like any mod. Yes, but half the programming like I said is already done. You just need to send false positives. That means if you are not close to the lead indicator it won't hit. But if you are closing in on it. You will get 100% accuracy do to a false positive.
In RB just plant the lead indicator in it, and then add onto it. That's how you pull it off. Now if I see a video of someone playing RB and they have a lead indicator. I will know it's a hack. That's pretty much it. But as in so difficult that it can't be done or someone won't do it for fun. No, they'll do it. If a teenager is willing to hack into secured networks for fun. There is someone out there that will do this for fun. Especially if it's a hacking group that keeps hearing how impossible it is. Which I notice anytime cheats come up. Everyone always says it's not possible.
To me they've lost their minds. It's almost like declaring an open challenge to any and all hackers. Never a smart idea. I can get the whole locking these threads. To keep people from looking for hacks. But also to keep those who don't understand. From inviting hackers to try. Gajin seems more like preemptive moves. To try and decrease attempts and to try and find the ones that are already on.
can we talk about tanks?
much slower moving, often stationary.
much more accurate guns
much more LoS/permeable cover
> aim bots live here
but they still seem pretty rare. much more common in 8.0 games it seems, but still rare.
at least rare i see someone im 90% sure is hacking
or maybe you confuse AI groundtargets with real players.
and see the exact amount of kills and battles etc.??
Can you actually explain what you mean by that? Yes, the final hit/miss decision is made by the server. That doesn't mean a client can't make the same calculations. It has all the necessary information
Thus the video in your OP is faked.
Entirely.