goodbye CV90105 TML

[RIFTMAKER]

I hope you know

´´CV 90105 XC-8 - Model replacement for the formerly designated CV90105 TML unit.´´

Is there a way to still have the old one?i would pay again if possible.

and why do they do that?

[RIFTMAKER]

Originally posted by dLFN:

They are replacing the CV 90105 TML with a CV 90105 XC-8 which is a buff. The CV 90105 TML was implemented unhistorically in-game and the most important details is that it doesn't a stabilizer, commander thermals and the gunner thermals are gen 1. To presumably avoid outrage they decided to just switch vehicles instead of nerfing it into the ground. The CV 90105 TML will be gone but I'm expecting it to return as a tech tree vehicle or event vehicle at 8.3 eventually.

TLDR: CV 90105 TML is unhistorical and the nerfs would cause too much outrage.

typical gayjin move as allways. thx for your info.......much anger now yay

[dLFN]

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

Originally posted by dLFN:

They are replacing the CV 90105 TML with a CV 90105 XC-8 which is a buff. The CV 90105 TML was implemented unhistorically in-game and the most important details is that it doesn't a stabilizer, commander thermals and the gunner thermals are gen 1. To presumably avoid outrage they decided to just switch vehicles instead of nerfing it into the ground. The CV 90105 TML will be gone but I'm expecting it to return as a tech tree vehicle or event vehicle at 8.3 eventually.

TLDR: CV 90105 TML is unhistorical and the nerfs would cause too much outrage.

typical gayjin move as allways. thx for your info.......much anger now yay

But it's a buff? Quite a strong one actually. If they nerf it people would complain, now that they're buffing it people complain. Are people never happy?

If you really love the CV 90105 with the TML turret specifically then you'll just have to wait because I'm sure it'll return one day in it's unstabilized form, it'll be exactly like the AMX-10RC but with tracks instead of wheels.

[Dozz]

Originally posted by dLFN:

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

typical gayjin move as allways. thx for your info.......much anger now yay

But it's a buff? Quite a strong one actually. If they nerf it people would complain, now that they're buffing it people complain. Are people never happy?

If you really love the CV 90105 with the TML turret specifically then you'll just have to wait because I'm sure it'll return one day in it's unstabilized form, it'll be exactly like the AMX-10RC but with tracks instead of wheels.

just to add to this, the XC-8 will have commander thermals and gunner thermals at gen 2 and still be stabilized, but now it gets DM33 instead of 23 a 5.0 second auto-loader and 3 instead of 4 crew, all of which are spaced out a ton. AND while the turret SEEMS bigger and to a ridiculous degree, its really not that bad from what ive seen.

[FizzyElf]

Originally posted by The_Insane_Canadian:

Originally posted by dLFN:

But it's a buff? Quite a strong one actually. If they nerf it people would complain, now that they're buffing it people complain. Are people never happy?

If you really love the CV 90105 with the TML turret specifically then you'll just have to wait because I'm sure it'll return one day in it's unstabilized form, it'll be exactly like the AMX-10RC but with tracks instead of wheels.

just to add to this, the XC-8 will have commander thermals and gunner thermals at gen 2 and still be stabilized, but now it gets DM33 instead of 23 a 5.0 second auto-loader and 3 instead of 4 crew, all of which are spaced out a ton. AND while the turret SEEMS bigger and to a ridiculous degree, its really not that bad from what ive seen.

the CV is now as tall as a leopard 2PL, its tall but its nothing like a Class 3P or a Maus.

[Acidic__Thought]

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

Originally posted by dLFN:

But it's a buff? Quite a strong one actually. If they nerf it people would complain, now that they're buffing it people complain. Are people never happy?

If you really love the CV 90105 with the TML turret specifically then you'll just have to wait because I'm sure it'll return one day in it's unstabilized form, it'll be exactly like the AMX-10RC but with tracks instead of wheels.

the problem with the ´´removal´´ is that its one less tank for sweden. and they allready have to less vehicles in some BRs. anyway it was my birthday present tank from my brother thats why i am in anger is some way....and i am also swedish. so yeah got some emotional connection to it

It's not one less tank, they're basically updating the model and giving it a name change.

[dLFN]

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

Originally posted by dLFN:

But it's a buff? Quite a strong one actually. If they nerf it people would complain, now that they're buffing it people complain. Are people never happy?

If you really love the CV 90105 with the TML turret specifically then you'll just have to wait because I'm sure it'll return one day in it's unstabilized form, it'll be exactly like the AMX-10RC but with tracks instead of wheels.

the problem with the ´´removal´´ is that its one less tank for sweden. and they allready have to less vehicles in some BRs. anyway it was my birthday present tank from my brother thats why i am in anger is some way....and i am also swedish. so yeah got some emotional connection to it

Okay you clearly have poor reading comprehension skills. It's not one less tank for Sweden, the CV 90105 with a TML turret will almost certainly come back eventually but be nerfed. You're getting a free upgrade to the tank your brother got you.

Also how can you like the CV 90105 TML? It's half French and you being a Swede I'm sure you're aware of how we mock them with the song about little frogs during midsummer.

[RIFTMAKER]

Originally posted by Acidic__Thought:

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

the problem with the ´´removal´´ is that its one less tank for sweden. and they allready have to less vehicles in some BRs. anyway it was my birthday present tank from my brother thats why i am in anger is some way....and i am also swedish. so yeah got some emotional connection to it

It's not one less tank, they're basically updating the model and giving it a name change.

true sorry for that. lets say it in a other way. they could have added it as an extra tank. econemy wise would be more sensefull . i think

[Col. Cornbread]

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

true sorry for that. lets say it in a other way. they could have added it as an extra tank. econemy wise would be more sensefull . i think

A Leo 1a5 is being added to Sweden as a 9.0 Premium (Norwegian variant)

[RIFTMAKER]

Originally posted by Col. Cornbread:

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

true sorry for that. lets say it in a other way. they could have added it as an extra tank. econemy wise would be more sensefull . i think

A Leo 1a5 is being added to Sweden as a 9.0 Premium (Norwegian variant)

i know. but yeah kinda a dissapointment.but its okay.maybe a good advertisment.



if i remember right its an copypaste with a little bit more amor .

[Col. Cornbread]

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

Originally posted by Col. Cornbread:

A Leo 1a5 is being added to Sweden as a 9.0 Premium (Norwegian variant)

i know. but yeah kinda a dissapointment.but its okay.maybe a good advertisment.



if i remember right its an copypaste with a little bit more amor .

nearly identical... but they should have instead given sweden a 2A4 Norwegian variant so that they have a near top tier premium instead of another 9.x one.

[FizzyElf]

Originally posted by Col. Cornbread:

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

i know. but yeah kinda a dissapointment.but its okay.maybe a good advertisment.



if i remember right its an copypaste with a little bit more amor .

nearly identical... but they should have instead given sweden a 2A4 Norwegian variant so that they have a near top tier premium instead of another 9.x one.

I think they are trying to fill the hole in swedens imaginary 9.0 lineup that the CV will be leaving when it goes to 9.3.

[Neckstabba]

Originally posted by Col. Cornbread:

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

i know. but yeah kinda a dissapointment.but its okay.maybe a good advertisment.



if i remember right its an copypaste with a little bit more amor .

nearly identical... but they should have instead given sweden a 2A4 Norwegian variant so that they have a near top tier premium instead of another 9.x one.

Yeah the Leo2A4 premium would be much better than the 1A5.

But I guess they made it so you can purchase both and use both in the same lineup without uptiering the CV by 0.7.
I guess it wouldn't matter much as the DM33 will easily be usable in 10.0 matches but oh well. Maybe we will get am 2A4 later.

[xCrossFaith]

That thing served me well for going up a bit in sweden, will miss it :(


But still the replacement looks better imho

[dLFN]

Originally posted by Col. Cornbread:

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

i know. but yeah kinda a dissapointment.but its okay.maybe a good advertisment.



if i remember right its an copypaste with a little bit more amor .

nearly identical... but they should have instead given sweden a 2A4 Norwegian variant so that they have a near top tier premium instead of another 9.x one.

Strv 121B prototype would be a better premium than a Norwegian 2A4.

[RIFTMAKER]

Originally posted by Col. Cornbread:

Originally posted by RIFTMAKER:

i know. but yeah kinda a dissapointment.but its okay.maybe a good advertisment.



if i remember right its an copypaste with a little bit more amor .

nearly identical... but they should have instead given sweden a 2A4 Norwegian variant so that they have a near top tier premium instead of another 9.x one.

ageed my guy