安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
- Rear Aspect IR seeker missile
- Doesn't give target any RWR warnings when fired
- Vulnerable to flares/alternate heat sources
R-3R:
- All Aspect SARH missile
- Gives off RWR warning to target (if target has RWR available)
- Vulnerable to Chaff/launched from a platform that doesn't have a great radar system
Neither of these missiles are effective against maneuvering targets and are primarily only effective against slow targets that aren't paying much attention. R-3R potentially gives you more versatility than R-3S since it can achieve a front aspect lock, but that's only if you can achieve a reliable radar lock which isn't likely to occur if you're below 3000m (not impossible mind you, just harder).
You're basically choosing a Radar game (SARH) which is more technical and requires good knowledge on how to position your aircraft to achieve Radar locks or a Dogfight game (Rear aspect IR) which requires good energy management and maneuvering discipline with knowing when to best utilize your missiles.
Otherwise, regular IR R-3S is the way to if you had to choose one of the Two.
I'm guessing this is for the MiG-21S?