Installer Steam
connexion
|
langue
简体中文 (chinois simplifié)
繁體中文 (chinois traditionnel)
日本語 (japonais)
한국어 (coréen)
ไทย (thaï)
Български (bulgare)
Čeština (tchèque)
Dansk (danois)
Deutsch (allemand)
English (anglais)
Español - España (espagnol castillan)
Español - Latinoamérica (espagnol d'Amérique latine)
Ελληνικά (grec)
Italiano (italien)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonésien)
Magyar (hongrois)
Nederlands (néerlandais)
Norsk (norvégien)
Polski (polonais)
Português (portugais du Portugal)
Português - Brasil (portugais du Brésil)
Română (roumain)
Русский (russe)
Suomi (finnois)
Svenska (suédois)
Türkçe (turc)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamien)
Українська (ukrainien)
Signaler un problème de traduction
If there was an era-based gamemode, the T-34 would be about the only enjoyable USSR tank as everything else would be absolutely eaten alive.
Putin clearly wouldn't allow this as it would demonstrate how obsolete their technology is and always has been.
This argument is null and void because it goes both ways. In the Jagdtiger you face cold war tanks with HEAT-FS and ATGMs that entirely nullify your armor. That's it, what are you going to do against cold war tanks with the Jagdtiger? Every cold war tank wins GG.
IS-1, T-34-85, KV-85 and a T-44 is more than capable of penetrating the side of the Jagdtiger. Not to mention you can joink the barrel very easily with those tanks, there you go - free kill.
But god forbid having to flank big heavily armored targets, we can't have that in War Thunder!
You forget their best bet against a Jagdtiger an IS-2.
However the thread talks about cold war tanks, not tanks produced in 1944. Thus you can add other WW2 tanks the IS-3 and the SU-100 and with these additions the odds aren't so stacked against them.
To my knowledge the T-44 did not see any combat in ww2. Sure it was produced in 1944 so what? Also in RB the T-44 is already 6.7 which matches the Jagdtiger's br, so Gaijin believe they are a fair match.
I'd agree with you Captain if we were talking about a normal tank. But this is a Jagdtiger. You take out it tracks and you can kill it, you take out its gun and you can kill it. In my opinion it is much more worse for a T-44 to face a T95. I take out its tracks, gun and it still manages to take off my tracks, because of its .50 cal. Denying the flank, which I pretty much deserved. Against a Jagdtiger no such problem.
And it works other way... why 5.7 tanks have to face something that they can't really touch from the front with standard shells?
BR needs to be decompressed...or stay depressed... like 70% of the playerbase.
But seriously Ferdinand doesn't belong to 6.7, should go back to 6.3.
Its about that ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ repair cost
And this is a relevant answer, how? I was talking about it being based on era, not 100% hyper realistic statistics.
And then you agree with me in the 2nd reply either way...?
Wat
for a other example... i believe the Jagdpanther with 6.0 is a very well ballanced BR.
U can get some bouncer a well gun but have enouth weakpoints to dont get overpowered
(WW1-2 BR1-10)(Cold War BR1-10)and (post Cold War 1-10). This way you could loosen up the BR and you wouldn’t get Cold War and WW2 vehicles crossing over. Your Jagdtigers and Later allied vehicles would be BR10 and so on down. I’m sure it’s not perfect but then some countries wouldn’t have tanks in lower BRs or their tank trees would have large gaps. Who knows.