Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So the only conclusion I can come to is that the AIM-9J either has a messed up explosive mass (Stat cards can lie), or it's detonation distance is jacked up somehow in comparison to other missiles in game.
There's nothing wrong with the AIM-9J. OP is just being salty.
Based on OP's logic, I should be claiming MiG-23s, J-7Es, and F-4EJ Kais are over powered because I've hit them with AIM-7Fs, which have a of explosive mass in an order of magnitude higher than AIM-9Js, and not insta kill them.
The inherent nature of how missiles do damage do not guarantee a kill nor mandatory for them to do enough damage to seriously hinder the flight performance of an aircraft, especially if the target was positioned/maneuvering in such a manner that prevented the shrapnel from the missile exploding hitting anything valuable.
no its not.
i used it to grind the entire US tech tree and it is an absolute pain plane.
because your missile failed to kill 1 F-5C once does not make it pay to win.
i don't know any top tier planes to be pay to win, all of them are horrible, except maybe for A-5C.
i flew F-5C for over 300 hours and i can confirm that not to be true.
the famed survivability comes from the fact that it can take some punishment every now and then, but just like any other aircraft its flight performance is seriously reduced.
given its a slow aircraft which barely hits supersonic speed at lower altitudes, its a meal for every other plane and it gets uptiered to 11.3 often.
the ability to take a shot and two and be able to limp for a while is not really a pay to win factor.
it has a pea shooter gun, with which you will crit a lot of planes and they keep flying as normal and it even has problems against stationary AI ground targets like howitzers etc. meaning you have to empty a considerable amount of rounds to get a "target destroyed".
its missiles are garbage for 10.3 (uncaged AIM-9B), it has no CCIP/CCRP and its a very slow plane.
as a matter of fact, this plane clearly is overtiered.
A-5C is a far better plane at 10.0.
ppl say its good for dogfights; you are usually too late to the centre of the map that either your team is dead or the enemy team is gone.
chasing a plane in dog fights easily get you killed as you will be shot from behind almost always by missiles.
almost every plane in 9.7 to 11.3 bracket is able to outrun you, and the only logical thing for grinding is to bomb bases. given you are slow as hell, you usually find yourself scraping what is left behind by F-105s and F-4Es and you have no CCIP/CCRP.
this plane has no place going against Mig-23s.
just check out its stats.
I consider it the polar opposite of the MiG-21SPS-K in all aspects really, as all the advantages of one cancel the other out.
Someone mentioned the R-60, I'd be more surprised if it was PL-2. R-60s have that happen with a lot of planes, largely due to their small explosive mass (1.15kg, compare with ~7.62 kg for the sidewinders and 8.8 kg for the PL-2). The only thing the R-60 has going for it is its agility really. Past that, it gets distracted easily by everything as well (the sun, flares, your teammate in the other side of the map, a guy who is grilling some burgers on the ground, anything but what it originally was going for).
I've survived shots in the Shenyang F-5, and the the MiG-21SPS-K and on a few ocassions. I've even had a Harrier get hit by a PL-2 and just get a "minor" Crit. Does that mean those planes have broken hitboxes too?
In the beginning it had a seriously messed up hitbox I remember. Apparently something was covering the engines module that shouldnt have, or they had forgotten something. They had nerfed it since, but that was a while back.
As I've said, taken it out with other armaments too. I did read just now on the reddit of it surviving multiple missile hits, but I'm sure convinced it isn't the DM but rather missile behavior as a whole. Especially ad most planes usually survive that missile hit initially, it's usually the resulting fire that finishes it off....
Just reiterating my experience, being on both sides found various missiles work mostly as they do with other planes (for some odd reason the PL-2 sticks to them better than other planes, which is odd for an AIM-9B copy.) I've found they also go down as easily too with all sorts of missiles Aimed at it.
maybe ♥♥♥♥ players like you are driving it down since that plane is ludicrously strong and loses no speed in turns?
before you say the "muh max speed" argument when have you ever seen a plane flying faster than 1200km/h in this game which the F-5C is easily capable of reaching? In fact because of it's very light (yet absurdly strong build) it accelerates faster than planes like the MiG-21 at times.