White Rock Fortress map the worst.

[Zeno]

White Rock Fortress map is by far the worst. This is an example for Gaijin lacking skill in developing maps. This map is not remotely appropriate for tank warfare at all and as frustrating as it gets in regards to driving and positioning.

I wish the game would stop forcing me to play this map even though it is in my filter for non-preferred maps...

[Keven]

Agreed. There are quite a few terrible maps in Warthunder....WRF is maybe the worst of them.

[Zeno]

Originally posted by Keven:

Agreed. There are quite a few terrible maps in Warthunder....WRF is maybe the worst of them.

I think that WRF would be an amazing map for a FPS such as Insurgency Sandstorm or the good old rainbow six (not siege), but for vehicles it's a pretty bad map and a bad place in general, even in a game like battlefield or Squad using large maps, I would avoid this location with vehicles at all.

[-reno-FR-]

Ok.

And so, for you what is a "good" map design?

Certainly a short, flat, no tree & no vegetation map.
And with some unarmed bots in front of you.

I will tell what is the real issue in War Thunder : some "players", who just never are happy.

You remind me some of those same "players" in PUBG : they only play ONE map, they cry for having new maps.
And when they have new maps, they are never happy.
Because for 2 reasons :
1- some of new maps are too similar to the original main map, so they cry.
2- some are really different & are requiring people to adapt themselves, so they cry.

In War Thunder, you will have lot of different maps.
Small, medium, large.
Some with open spaces, others with lot of vegetation / rocks / hills / flat zones & others with city environnement.

Of course, you will have the possibility to meet some environnements that suit really perfectly YOUR way of playing such a game.

And of course, you will ALSO have some maps that will require for you more effort because they are quite different than what you would expect / than that you are used to play usually.

Why just don't enjoy the stuff?
Why don't you just accept the "challenge" to adapt yourself?

Is it so hard for people?

Apparently, it is...

[Zeno]

Originally posted by -reno-FR-:

Ok.

And so, for you what is a "good" map design?

Certainly a short, flat, no tree & no vegetation map.
And with some unarmed bots in front of you.

I will tell what is the real issue in War Thunder : some "players", who just never are happy.

You remind me some of those same "players" in PUBG : they only play ONE map, they cry for having new maps.
And when they have new maps, they are never happy.
Because for 2 reasons :
1- some of new maps are too similar to the original main map, so they cry.
2- some are really different & are requiring people to adapt themselves, so they cry.

In War Thunder, you will have lot of different maps.
Small, medium, large.
Some with open spaces, others with lot of vegetation / rocks / hills / flat zones & others with city environnement.

Of course, you will have the possibility to meet some environnements that suit really perfectly YOUR way of playing such a game.

And of course, you will ALSO have some maps that will require for you more effort because they are quite different than what you would expect / than that you are used to play usually.

Why just don't enjoy the stuff?
Why don't you just accept the "challenge" to adapt yourself?

Now I know why I had to click " Show comment " before reading your post. lol.

[Chaoslink]

Eh, there’s worse maps. I’m not a fan of it either, but Campania (Italy) is definitely worse. Maginot line is also a pretty bad one if it’s not high tier simply because the map is too big. Could just be that I hate sniper maps like that as I primarily play short 75mm Shermans and other vehicles that don’t perform well long range.

[Freakshow]

What's that naval map that starts out both teams around 8km broadside from each other? South African or African Gulf or something.

That's the worst map :-P That's a battleship's wet dream map.

[Zeno]

Originally posted by Chaoslink:

Eh, there’s worse maps. I’m not a fan of it either, but Campania (Italy) is definitely worse. Maginot line is also a pretty bad one if it’s not high tier simply because the map is too big. Could just be that I hate sniper maps like that as I primarily play short 75mm Shermans and other vehicles that don’t perform well long range.

Tanks simply perform at long distance though.

[-SIBERIANWOLF-]

map=

[Jaes]

War Thunder players: "This is the worst map!!!"

Karelia: "Hold my Vodka"

[lanz]

Originally posted by wombat92:

Originally posted by Chaoslink:

Eh, there’s worse maps. I’m not a fan of it either, but Campania (Italy) is definitely worse. Maginot line is also a pretty bad one if it’s not high tier simply because the map is too big. Could just be that I hate sniper maps like that as I primarily play short 75mm Shermans and other vehicles that don’t perform well long range.

Tanks simply perform at long distance though.

Tanks simply don't perform at long distance though... The average tank in the ww2 was rather useless beyond 2km due to how unreliable it was to hit the target or to even inflict any damage to the target.

[mogami_99]

you can block maps you don't like this map was my first

[mooreshawnm]

Random maps is the way...

[Shard]

Originally posted by -reno-FR-:

Ok.

And so, for you what is a "good" map design?

-snip-

Nah man, this game has absolutely terrible maps and they never learn or improve on their mistakes.

[Chaoslink]

Originally posted by wombat92:

Originally posted by Chaoslink:

Eh, there’s worse maps. I’m not a fan of it either, but Campania (Italy) is definitely worse. Maginot line is also a pretty bad one if it’s not high tier simply because the map is too big. Could just be that I hate sniper maps like that as I primarily play short 75mm Shermans and other vehicles that don’t perform well long range.

Tanks simply perform at long distance though.

Again, I'm talking tanks like M4 Shermans with 75mm guns and other short barreled tanks at low BRs. They don't have the speed or the firepower for that kind of range usually and the drive into battle is horrible. If you fail the first push, you might never get a second.

[Zeno]

Originally posted by lanz:

Originally posted by wombat92:

Tanks simply perform at long distance though.

Tanks simply don't perform at long distance though... The average tank in the ww2 was rather useless beyond 2km due to how unreliable it was to hit the target or to even inflict any damage to the target.

2 km is quite a distance, especially if you look at War Thunder maps.

Originally posted by Chaoslink:

Originally posted by wombat92:

Tanks simply perform at long distance though.

Again, I'm talking tanks like M4 Shermans with 75mm guns and other short barreled tanks at low BRs. They don't have the speed or the firepower for that kind of range usually and the drive into battle is horrible. If you fail the first push, you might never get a second.

I sniped with the M4 so many times and avoiding urban areas always helped me to survive.