Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
how so?
the whole point of low tiers would become obsolote as there is little reward and you are not forced to play it, its always been a build up, as you get into the higher tiers you earn more SL
But uhm... its kinda idiotic to spend time and research and premium and stuff into a tank from the 30s then 40s then 50s just to finally get to the 80s and so on.
Was one of the main reasons why I stopped playing. The progression is awful. I prefer Mechwarrior Online way of doing things far more.
I remember that there are tanks that you can buy with premium currency and that they ignored research and most requirements. I'd be willing to pay lets say 20$ for some premium version of a T-64 like I dunno T-64BM. Maybe another 20$ for a helicopter then for a Tunguska and BMP3 if it exists perhaps... but playing with WW2 tanks for hundreds of hours? Hell no.
yeah I'll find an alternative, thx for the replies everyone.
You sound like a stupid noob tbh.
If I go and buy a pretty modern tank straight away my crew will be trash and I still need to get all the upgrades. Also as always no matter which tank you buy there's always a stronger one out there. Oh and I'd have 1 tank but to properly play I'd need 3.
Most people wouldn't bother. They're engulfed with the grinding frenzy. It all being about the "ride" through the tiers. Enjoying to earn the money to get the next version of their T-34 and see how it goes.
You argue that a bad implementation would be bad. Nowhere do I ask for badly implemented shortcuts, I'd like well implemented shortcuts.