Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
For a time, the T-34-100 was definitely an option, especially when it used to be at 6.3 and overmatch needed to be twice the amount of amor, which means the T-34 effectively had 90mm along with 60 sloping so there was an air of invincibility about it.
Now with the recent changes, it WILL get oneshotted anywhere on the tank.
I've never made the T-34-100 work on my end but its still very possible to do good in it.
OP you couldnt have gone wrong with either choice. personally i went with the 122, because in SB im usually first to fire. and with the 122 firing twice is rare, and if you do need to, chances are hes crippled so bad hes not returning fire.
the down side is if theres 2 enemy tanks....you either dont fire until theyve passed. or you get trigger happy and die.
No regrets.
Also, I wouldnt call 30+mm of more hull armor "slight" seeing as its impenetrable by anything less than 105mm. That armor can't be overmatched, not even the long-barrel 90mm on the M26E1 or the Super Pershing can do it. Only the 105mm on the Tiger 10.5, the T29 and the Jagdtiger can best that hull armor.
the 45mm hull armor on the T-34 on the otherhand... unless its sloped at 80+ degrees, it isn't going to bounce anything.
saying the 122 will do less damage is factually incorrect.