War Thunder

War Thunder

View Stats:
Pros and cons of Japanese tanks
Self-explanatory
< >
Showing 1-14 of 14 comments
Haegler Mar 15, 2020 @ 2:29am 
Pros & Cons
Average mobility
Average to below average armour
Average to below average guns
Lack of lineups.

Useful and usable but not exactly sticking out in any field I'd say.
burg4401 Mar 15, 2020 @ 2:52am 
agree with dresden,
at low level crap guns, past rb 3.3, some of them have very good guns.
Haegler Mar 15, 2020 @ 2:56am 
Originally posted by burg4401:
agree with dresden,
at low level crap guns, past rb 3.3, some of them have very good guns.
Talking of the Type II guns with the Kou ammo?

Average Guns. They have a decent flat pen...but unlike most other guns atrocious angle pen, so atrocious that you actually have a not too small chance to bounce off a Sherman's or T-34s front.

Pretty good filler tho.
burg4401 Mar 15, 2020 @ 2:59am 
Originally posted by Haegler:
Originally posted by burg4401:
agree with dresden,
at low level crap guns, past rb 3.3, some of them have very good guns.
Talking of the Type II guns with the Kou ammo?

Average Guns. They have a decent flat pen...but unlike most other guns atrocious angle pen, so atrocious that you actually have a not too small chance to bounce off a Sherman's or T-34s front.

Pretty good filler tho.

Na-to at 3.3 and the chi-ni2 3.7 off the top of my head, if you can't kill with those 2 vehicles, it is you.
Anything can bounce off a sherman or t34 if you don't aim, I don't blame the tank for my bad shooting.
Last edited by burg4401; Mar 15, 2020 @ 3:01am
Haegler Mar 15, 2020 @ 3:11am 
Originally posted by burg4401:
Originally posted by Haegler:
Talking of the Type II guns with the Kou ammo?

Average Guns. They have a decent flat pen...but unlike most other guns atrocious angle pen, so atrocious that you actually have a not too small chance to bounce off a Sherman's or T-34s front.

Pretty good filler tho.

Na-to at 3.3 and the chi-ni2 3.7 off the top of my head, if you can't kill with those 2 vehicles, it is you.
Anything can bounce off a sherman or t34 if you don't aim, I don't blame the tank for my bad shooting.
Chi-Nu 2 but yes, they come with the worse version, the so-called Type I. However, they also come with a superior battlerating where it is much more effective. Tho I wouldn't name Chi-Nu 2 since unless you shell out bucks, you won't be getting it.

It's basically the one shining ray of light in the japanese tree when it comes to pen before you get to the CHEAT-FS guns at which point armour doesn't matter anymore anyway.

The later Type II guns tend to get shafted by anything that angles.

So basically a bad gun doesn't exist because any gun can penetrate somewhere. Bad guns are just bad players.
Slyke Mar 15, 2020 @ 3:17am 
Originally posted by dresden:
Pros:
They have good guns

Cons:
Everything else.
More like good ammo. Guns are mostly average.
I'd also add suspension and optics to pros.
Scheneighnay Mar 15, 2020 @ 6:28am 
Pros:
-very low repair costs
-good filler
-good flat pen
-not common so players might not be familiar with your armor layout

Cons:
-All of your armor is in your front plates. A reserve 37mm can easily pen the Chi Ri from the side. Don't angle because of that.
-no pen whatsoever against slopes
-later imperial tanks are huge targets
-no real CAS options
Last edited by Scheneighnay; Mar 15, 2020 @ 6:29am
Eggmanjames Mar 15, 2020 @ 7:01am 
Pros: THEY'RE COMIN OUTTA DA TREES

Cons: Oh ♥♥♥♥♥ wrong war
:cozybethesda:
Scheneighnay Mar 15, 2020 @ 7:21am 
Originally posted by eggmanjames:
Pros: THEY'RE COMIN OUTTA DA TREES

Cons: Oh ♥♥♥♥♥ wrong war
:cozybethesda:
I already say "go home GI" in [all] chat when I play as China
Scheneighnay Mar 15, 2020 @ 9:36am 
Originally posted by Mirage:
Main downside being the lack of lineups I'd say.. some of their early game stuff is really good, but after I guess 5.0 there are large gaps where you can't make great lineups.. the Ho-Ri is still 7.0 for some reason with an absurd repair, the STB has no backups as both the Type 60 and Type 75 are useless, so you have to grind out the next vehicle using only the STB, maybe using backups.

Top tier also isn't great, the Type 90 B helps but it has a ridiculous repaircost despite being a carbon copy from the regular Type 90.
I would say the tree in general goes downhill at 4.7, both between individual vehicle performance and gaps.

Low-tier isn't spectacular, but it's not bad. Naturally the 2.0 Chi-Ha Kai can't pen a reserve LVT at long range, but the same LVT can frontally pen it from the same distance no problem, but that's the norm with fighting American reserves.
FD_Stalker Mar 15, 2020 @ 10:14am 
陸軍は馬鹿です:B1:
Scheneighnay Mar 15, 2020 @ 11:09am 
Originally posted by FD_Stalker:
陸軍は馬鹿です:B1:
日本の軍は陰茎が大
Shard Mar 15, 2020 @ 11:30am 
Originally posted by Scheneighnay:
Originally posted by FD_Stalker:
陸軍は馬鹿です:B1:
日本の軍は陰茎が大
お母さん、私はオンライン翻訳を使用できるように見える
Scheneighnay Mar 15, 2020 @ 11:51am 
Originally posted by Shard:
Originally posted by Scheneighnay:
日本の軍は陰茎が大
お母さん、私はオンライン翻訳を使用できるように見える
でも陰茎が翻訳のデフォルトではない
< >
Showing 1-14 of 14 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 15, 2020 @ 2:18am
Posts: 14