安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
i think the moralizing approach about putting the blame on one side just disrupts the thread's mood and nothing else: just by taking a look at this damn forum, many have enough of the company being blamed for what they do not consider an issue, but many of those blame in turn the source of criticism itself. i think this silly scapegoat game is fruitless if not counterproductive.
for now i believe you folks have recognized two main branches to have less assertive game monetization (assuming you wish for it):
-fiddling with video games legislation, setting hard limits for devs to follow
-fiddling with the targeted audience, making them develop standards actively rejecting super assertive models, leading to companies adjusting themselves
no alledged moral principle makes one way more legitimate than the other imo, else it would feel so trivial we would not debate such matter to begin with. you pick one, the other, perhaps both, for the sake of pragmatic interests in relation to the set goal.
biggest issue is that in any case, you will have to work your ass off to even start hoping realistically, and i doubt anyone in this forum has the resources to spare on such a formidable project.
I work in the law field, I think that most companies are just one micro-transaction away from a severe fine from the EU. Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Samsung went all under investigations and sometime were heavily fined by EU, for most games companies is just a matter of time, their immoral practices will be sanctioned sooner or later. Generally the EU is a bit slow to act, but it doesn't tolerate corporations exploiting their customers with unfair strategies.
Meanwhile, it's our duty as oldtime gamers that see why these business models are not fair, to continue to point them out.
I've chosen not to pay for premium time, and man does this game really punish you for that since researching vehicles and their parts in mid-high tier is, I feel, impossible; I think I've been stuck in 6.0 BR range for 3 months, which, in my opinion, is the worst tier for american tanks.
Then you have gaijin catering to the german mains that cry that germany suffers bc one time their 88 mm gun bounce off a t34 or a 76 sherman and now they have to be raised in br and the tiger should go down to 4.3.
Then you have stuff like BR compression, horrible map design, etc. This game has easily fixable big problems and a lot of smaller annoyances that gaijin chooses not to fix bc they're lazy, and their payment model relies on you getting pissed and buying ge, premium, or blatantly overpowered vehicles.
Problem is when companies make billions out of pigeons a fine will never hurt them... best kind of cash bleeding would be to boycott or something like that
i feel you man, the map design sometimes and their way of forcing you to buy premium hits hard
To each his own I guess. I mean I agree in principle with some of what you say, but perhaps not as strongly worded as you say.
I personally think combined battles is a good idea but needs some balancing. You could for example limit the amount of active aircraft per team or you could do it a similar way to Arcade mode, but perhaps less often.
Crossplay is fine in my opinion and doesn't carry any skill barriers until you get to the very highest level.
The BR system without uptier/downtiers would be fine, but given the sheer number of BR's it would be difficult to find a game without having a range. This could be helped(not fixed, but helped) if they reduced the range slightly.
The devs do make some strange decisions, they also seem to be indecisive with some updates, like the sounds... They don't seem to want to leave the sounds alone and I do question the level of bug proofing they do before releasing updates.
The anti-cheat is indeed useless. But that's not based on how many cheaters I see in War Thunder, which in 1500 hours I could count on 1 hand(that I could prove are cheating). It's based on previous experiences in other games where the anti-cheat has not detected blatant cheats like spin-bots and hardlock aimbots. It's also quite buggy too and often throws you out of game for "game violation #000000001" because it detected its own process running... Lol(I'm exaggerating, it's because of a bug not because it detects its self).