Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
With tanks as anything without composite armor + reactive armor will get 1 shot killed. And when APS systems are implemented on MBTs no rocket/missile based weapon could fight of MBTs.
Most modern jets rely more on more intelligent missiles than their guns. Aircraft engagements will begin beyond line of sight as most of the gameplay will focus on dodging missles than dog fighting.
Modern ships will just shoot missles at each other behind island at the edges of the map. The first ship to run out of defensive CIWs ammo will die.
M2A2 is kinda that its got a 50 and a 30 and goes vroom
whats the problem with such people? everyone is entitled to have their own preferences.
plus, honestly, it wouldnt be the first modern vehicle being mixed with WW2 ones, so nothing new here.
personally I like both so I dont care
should gaijin force them to play through ww2 stuff?
or should they force people that like modern stuff to grind through the cold war stuff
or maybe they should split the tree into 3 parts
and then the people that want ww1 stuff maybe they should split the trees into 4 parts
and what about those that want vietnam stuff but not korean war stuff i guess we got to split the trees 5 ways now?
oh and what about all the interwar stuff from the 1920 i bet some people will want to start there too so i guess we will split the trees into 6 parts
This would make a lot of sense.