Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
No, as I don't rely on an overexaggaration of clichees such as you do. You seem to have an anti-German mentality in general and lack the capability of talking about topics objectively.
Sad that everything you have said is simply wrong and pretty much the opposite of what historic sources talk about, Tiger crew barely trained hitler youth??? LMAO, stop watching disney channel please.
But I won't go in to this any further, your comment is completely out of context and just provocation.
I did.
But I got the game many years ago when it was actually somewhat realistic and RB battles still had a realistic nation set up and such and cold war tanks did not even exist. Not my problem they completely change the game over the years and drift away from what they originally stood for, which was realism, accuracy and fun.
Air was around back then and had the same issue your complaining of now. Why would you expect tanks to be different
Wrong. Late war Germany was not like this nor did all the tigers broke down before reaching frontlines. What a load of bullocks :))))
Kind of true, but I did not notice the issue with air that much, maybe I just played the " proper " nations ? LMAO
Not a lot either. These incidents were reported but not as common as you claim it to be.
Sadly there are many hobby historians out there who think to know better without reading in to German sources and only rely on daily U.S news that tend to overexaggarate things and put down whatever was made or produced in Germany (and still is).
If you think you know, do your reading, currently I only see bias. Sounds comfortable to you doesn't it? But wasn't reality, sorry.
It's the same bias as French cars apparently breaking down a lot that most Europeans seem to claim. I drive French cars and non of them has broken down so far, in fact I am more than happy.
You talk about one incident with the Ferdinand. So what? This wasn't the only tank to catch fire challenging the engine too much. And the Ferdinand wasn't a tank anyway it was a tank destroyer, supposed to be used for defensive tactics.
And maybe, if they were lost to mechanical failure then this was because they were next to impossible to maintain on the frontlines, so they pushed their vehicles to over the limit while T34, Shermans and others could easily be field maintained.
Tigers and Panthers were still extremely reliable and far superior to all other allied tanks, even if you my French friend, can sleep better at night believing otherwise.
Every military historian who has focused on German technology will tell you that your claims are not true and I have seen your arguments soo many times..always the same out of context garbage. People going around and claim how unreliable German tanks were without comparing, without looking at the situation and without actually looking in to the killcount UNTIL they were left behind and abandoned.
It's always the same pattern.
But man, keep telling yourself this if you want that people who really have a clue laugh about you behind your back and your mind can sleep calmly at night, go for it. War is over anyway for now. I guess.
PS: I can find dozens of articles online even in English that claim otherwise and prove you wrong! Sometimes it does not hurt to actually research even the things you might not want to hear. THIS is what makes up an intelligent human.,
Give me a source please where an entire colum (whatever colum is in this context) caught fire based on an engine issue.
And the problem with the Ferdinand wasn't only the transmission, it was that the engine was too weak for the weight of the tank, hence it get overheated easier.
German tanks were superior in every single aspect, once again...look up some source.
I am done here, you are a Alliedaboo. You French people just have to accept that you are residing next to a sleeping gorilla that can get mad any day :D
They sure kicked France's ass anyway.
Still no source to back up your ridiculous claims?
Germany lost the war because they were heavily outnumbered, surely not because of their technology. An other statement that can only come from someone who has absolutely no clue what he is talking about.
Please kiddo, stick to CS:GO and stop trying to talk history and technology if all your knowledge is based on is the " Daily News " and some 16 yrs olds YouTube channels trying to boost their anti-German sentiment.
And it was you who started calling me a Wehraboo, what do you expect? Haven't you learnt what a " reaction " to your " action " is?
Cute.
Forums are full of individuals like you and I am really done discussing this, climb to my level then we can talk again at the same level of knowledge.
That claim is just plainly wrong.
While they had some of the better guns and as they went on, amour that could take a beating while still being able to continue fighting better in ''every aspect'' is a joke.
It isnt just a case of reliability issue, of which many tanks and TDs did suffer breakdowns, but also a maintenance issue. As many of the components were a difficult task to replace easily.
Due to the sizes, towing wasnt always a viable option, aswell as many tanks etc unable to cross bridges due to their size/weight.
You also have to consider the situations each nation was in. While the sherman is always insulted as a tank, especially early variants, they were easy to repair/replace, had far easier maintenance, and also had to be shipped across. And continued to be upgraded in a way that many older parts may of still been compatible for newer models.
The us also had a massive production base.
Germany had no where near the same production capability or the supply of raw materials and yet invested what little they had into large unwieldy monsters of tanks that quite often never repayed their costs back in effective use with many never or barely making it into combat.
Inferior in speed of production, ease of maintenance, reliability especially in certain models, high consumption in fuel, too large for the most common recovery vehicles, and majorly lacking in numbers due to high production cost/lack of materials and industrial capabilities.
They just simply werent the tanks that matched the situation germany was starting to find itself in.
Now if they had the resources and a bit more time for development/testing and were able to produce them in larger numbers then they couldve come closer to being a game changer. But they didnt,