Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
the lowe simply never existed off paper and never was going to, the maus was selected instead
there is a difference between these two things and how you choose to define 'paper vehicle' is merely a question semantics, this is not about where you personally draw that line
It's not like the Z-1 would have just been a slight iteration from the Z-0. The entire base of the plane, including the weaponry, had completely changed.
you are simply choosing to define 'paper vehicle' in a way i disagree with, this argument is a pointless matter of perspective and semantics, there is a definate difference between a project for which actual material existed and a design which litterally only existed drawn on paper never even intended to be made as happend to the lowe
It's essentially the line I prefer to be the limit unless a nation REALLY needs something (like the Ho-Ri for example).
this e100:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/E-100.jpg
then they just shoved a maus turret on it, at least both parts existed
look people we are getting derailed arguing semantics on what constitutes a 'paper tank' but can we at least agree some component of all the questionable ingame vehicles mentioned thus far actually existed, the lowe never existed off paper and was never going to
EDIT: if you were to replace the 88 with the original 75 you might get away with calling it the speculative result of what the panther II project might have produced but even calling that paper is an insult to other paper designs as such a thing didnt even make it to the drawing board
armor mobility and firepower
no thanks
Paper tanks are great fun, but the only game with paper tanks is WoT which WG are just utterly destroying.
WT on the other hand has nicer gameplay, but gaijin are stuckups that only want realistic vehicles so they have atleast something that they can use to put a "realism" tag on their game.