M16 MGMC or M15 CGMG?

[eNoble-US]

Ik I just posted recently about aircraft, but now I have a question about anti-aircraft, which is better? Is losing the two .50s for a 37mm worth it? The only viable tactic I could see with the M15 is engaging with the .50's, and when youre reloading, the pilot should realize that and come at you, and you can then hit him with the 37 mil.

[Warheadmeiky]

i fav. the 4 x 50 cal

[PMA]

I choose the M16.

[eNoble-US]

Originally posted by RAIDONKU:

I choose the M16.

If Raindonku chooses the M16, then question answered boys.

[Katokevin]

The 37mm can help if you have to fire at ground targets and cause lots of damage against aircraft (sometimes), but I would prefer the 4 .50's as the 37mm has a low ammo count (plus the recent .50 buff).

[Donovar]

I would prefer the Sherman Skink 4 20mms would do a much better job

[Eftwyrd]

just 2 50 cals is not good enough to bring down many attackers or bombers before they can kill you and the low velocity of the 37mm makes it difficult to use against fast moving targets and its not good enough against ground targets to make much of a difference. the extra weight of the 37mm and armour on the gun mount also makes the m15 sluggish and easy to tip on rough terrain, i would advise sticking with the m16

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

M15 is just trash, horrible gun placement. M16 is lot more effective.

[Gerth]

The m16 is so much better

[Max Headroom]

M16 if you're actually using it for it's intended role, M15 if you're wanting to double as a light tank destroyer/flanker.

Just don't expect to use your 37mm on fighters unless you're dead on with your aim.

[LordBagel]

personally, i favor the m16 because the 37mm is very unreliable