Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not to mention the cost of leveling them up and the price of the tank itself
It has the same HP/t as a T-34-85.
It has less than 1°/s turret traverse than a Sherman.
It has more frontal armour than almost, if not every heavy tank at 5.7 effective.
It has 189mm of penetration at 10m, with AP(HE)CBC.
It has the trinity of mobility, firepower, and armour, while sacrificing almost nothing in return. It has the firepower to easily dispatch any 5.7 at any range, the accuracy to do so, the armour to, not be immune, but very strong frontally at 5.7 and give even the better 5.7 guns a good run if loosely aimed, and the mobility to compete with the other mediums at it’s BR with it’s other advantages.
Not to mention, it has the Panther D (pretty much the same, but slower and with poor turret rotation and no APCR), Tiger I series, and more as backups, with great CAS, making an amazing lineup.
I honestly believe the reason this tank isn’t pulling 70% winrates is
>often CQC and small maps
>BR compression, often uptiers
>5.7 is popular with Germany, so often uptiers are a team of 80-90% 5.7 Germans vs 70-80% 6.0, 6.3, 6.7 Russian/US/UK/etc. tanks.
I honestly believe it is that good. All issues it has, except for the two very minor ‘less than average side armour’ and ‘poor reverse’ are overal related issues, not with the tank.