Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Like if anyone cares lol
At 10.0?
All the time. The T-64/72/80 UFP is at 60 degrees, the internal armour on the Abrams (both models, and everywhere on them) is at 60 degrees (bar the monolithic blocks), even the T-62M1 UFP is at 60 degrees
UFP and LFP of all of those is highly angled, especially the internal armour.
All of the NERA on the Abrams is at ~60 degrees.
The only things that aren't highly angled are the turret faces of the 2A4, Type-90 and T-series, which were impenetrable anyway.
The changes could make the T-64B UFP a lot less effective, so people won't have to aim for the driver's area anymore
Another attempt to save russian mbt junk.
Great the CR get ♥♥♥♥♥♥ even more, even less pen.
Nope, it's also getting a nerf. Challenger has to be the worst top tier MBT, comrades!
You answered your own question.
With ERA it's almost immune to every HEAT round/ATGM, only really vulnerable to two APFSDS rounds, the Rhienmetal 120 firing DM23, or JM33