The SU-57 and all of its cousins are sh***t, convince me otherwise.

[xocorret]

• Slow as hell
  
• Lack of gun depression denies nearly all terrain usage
  
• No armor
  
• And terrible accuracy (Also, maximum zoom level of the gunners scope on the SU-57 is like 1.01x magnification)

I rest my case.

[kamikazi21358]

Originally posted by Ichigo:

and the SU-122-54

Stock SU-122-54 makes you want to commit invade-russia-in-winter tho.

[B.D.Godde]

Originally posted by kamikazi21358:

Originally posted by Ichigo:

and the SU-122-54

Stock SU-122-54 makes you want to commit invade-russia-in-winter tho.

lel

just saying guys, I am about to make a troll post as proof of concept that troll posts grab attention
no one interfere. I will make it on russian tree being unfairly biased

[The One True Git]

Originally posted by theGoddes:

Originally posted by redned:

whats there to convince you of it is a well known fact that 90% of SOV TD's are trash.
slow
no armour
one shot from any side
pretty much anything that would give a TD any advantage SOV TD's don't have

but they have a gun
and it shoots
and SOMETIMES its better than other tank's guns

Or you have the SU-100Y and laugh at anything with your 130mm schlong.

[B.D.Godde]

Originally posted by redned:

Originally posted by Shard:

You are clearly missing out on the SU-85 and SU-85M, those two are great. SU-152 is also still pretty good. Afterwards the SU line gets pretty average to bad.

I've tried most of the SOV TD's just can't get passed the stock grind

Originally posted by Omega Sirius:

Try the SU-100

I got my SU-100p in my lineup It is good when you get a good map for it. and I love when every thing over pens me

the best armour is... none at all
(just saying, you ruined my proof of concept bait post)

[Illusionyary]

Originally posted by xocorret:

Originally posted by Illusionyary:

Why did you buy it then? SU-57 is a premium so I'm not sure why everyone is talking about stock grinds when it doesn't have one.

Unless we're talking about the SU-57B?

I actually meant the SU-57B. Why are they all called the same? Who does that? Is it to confuse the enemy or something?

Also who in the right mind would buy a pre-war Moskovitch with a strapped on navy gun and expect it to perform? (Especially in a tank game with no artillery meta. I am convinced if there were something like that, a lot of tanks would perform better since they can fulfill the roles they were designed for.)

Ah okay then, yeah the SU-57B sucks. Should be a much lower BR than it is.

"SU" is the Soviet tank destroyer designation so most start with that, the premium one is a halftrack with a gun on it so I was quite confused lol.

[sneakybass]

Originally posted by xocorret:

• Slow as hell
  
• Lack of gun depression denies nearly all terrain usage
  
• No armor
  
• And terrible accuracy (Also, maximum zoom level of the gunners scope on the SU-57 is like 1.01x magnification)

I rest my case.

Don't even get me started on this post I play American my t-92 optics geees I get eye strain lol. don't even get me started on the m-18.............

[B.D.Godde]

Originally posted by You Die0244:

Originally posted by xocorret:

• Slow as hell
  
• Lack of gun depression denies nearly all terrain usage
  
• No armor
  
• And terrible accuracy (Also, maximum zoom level of the gunners scope on the SU-57 is like 1.01x magnification)

I rest my case.

Don't even get me started on this post I play American my t-92 optics geees I get eye strain lol. don't even get me started on the m-18.............

it doesn't make sense.
rank II: good optics
rank III and IV: bad optics
rank V and VI: beautiful optics
why??????

[Illusionyary]

Originally posted by theGoddes:

Originally posted by You Die0244:

Don't even get me started on this post I play American my t-92 optics geees I get eye strain lol. don't even get me started on the m-18.............

it doesn't make sense.
rank II: good optics
rank III and IV: bad optics
rank V and VI: beautiful optics
why??????

It depends on the tank. Afaik past tier II they've been adding realistic zoom levels to tanks. Try the Jagdpanther, it has insane zoom, while the Tiger II doesn't.

[Franss the Coffee Addict]

Originally posted by kamikazi21358:

Originally posted by Ichigo:

and the SU-122-54

Stock SU-122-54 makes you want to commit invade-russia-in-winter tho.

somebody hasnt played chiftain mk.5 stock

[NAF-5th.Legion-Waffen.Div]

Originally posted by Ichigo:

and the SU-122-54

horrible optics, it was a huge letdown.

[kamikazi21358]

Originally posted by Franss the Coffee Addict:

Originally posted by kamikazi21358:

Stock SU-122-54 makes you want to commit invade-russia-in-winter tho.

somebody hasnt played chiftain mk.5 stock

Yes, but this is a Russian vehicle. The nation is not as used to misery like the British Rank IV+ tree.

[Omega Sirius]

Originally posted by redned:

Originally posted by Shard:

You are clearly missing out on the SU-85 and SU-85M, those two are great. SU-152 is also still pretty good. Afterwards the SU line gets pretty average to bad.

I've tried most of the SOV TD's just can't get passed the stock grind

Originally posted by Omega Sirius:

Try the SU-100

I got my SU-100p in my lineup It is good when you get a good map for it. and I love when every thing over pens me

I said SU-100, not SU-100P

[kamikazi21358]

it’s a single letter difference, so su him.

[B.D.Godde]

Originally posted by kamikazi21358:

it’s a single letter difference, so su him.

man...

this went WAY off topic...