Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I’m gonna guess it’s the M1A2.
The Leopard 2A5 has better overall armour but compared to the M1A2 lacks the same firepower and survivability
So it all depends what you value most, firepower and survivability or armour?
I don’t have the M1A2 but I have the 2A5. I would take the 2A5 over the M1A2 because of being a superior hulldown tank.
Therefore I would definitely have to say Leopard 2A5 on this case due to better Armour and also German players and their Italian allies will actually use AA at this BR.
Both mbts are on par eachother i guess, i think most loves both and play and perform the same with both...
I can be wrong, yes, but this again, is hard question...
Austria won the second one, with USA coming third, but apart from that Germany usually wins.
IIRC that was more about crews than the individual tanks though, for example part of the competition includes a small arms shoot and physical tasks.
change my mind