War Thunder

War Thunder

View Stats:
OBJ-195?
Miss the days of russian bias at top tier? Want a KV-2 with a 10 second reload? Want to lob 152mm ATGMs? Well do i have an offer for you, introducing the late 90's OBJ-195! https://www.reddit.com/r/TankPorn/comments/9p5v2x/obj_195/ WTF is that beside the huge f*ck off 152mm, that's a 30mm 2A42 for getting those pesky italian go karts to f*ck the hell off (also serves to brutalise the sides of any MBT) The hull, good as inpentrable from the front with K5 and T-80U esque layout watch the abroomz and leopards cry as their 600mm pen APFSDS rounds are absorbed by composite armor or snapped by the inbuilt kontakt 5 ERA. The best part is the 152mm gun, firing APFSDS, HE-FRAG, HEAT-FS and ATGMs. This is not a serious suggestion this is a joke mabye as an april fools event tank, otherwise it'd be broken AF, huge gun to kill every other mbt, Armour to make it frontally invunerable, An autocannon to shoot down CAS or teach those italian go karts who's the boss. It could be something like a BR 12.0 tank along with M1A2, leopard 2A7, Challenger mk 2 and other modern post 90's MBT's.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 16 comments
here's a more technical summary of the vehicle: https://aw.my.com/us/news/general/development-object-195
kamikazi21358 Jan 6, 2019 @ 3:10am 
Yeah, uhh, probably in a couple years if even,
so it doesn’t kill everything. It would have to be with M1A2 SEPs and stuff as you mentioned. But this is assuming they even go that modern.
Obamenau Jan 6, 2019 @ 3:19am 
Yeah maybe in the far future this , the Thumper and 140mm Leopard 2 could from the top of the GF tree.
kamikazi21358 Jan 6, 2019 @ 3:40am 
I have a feeling though both 195 and the thumper may end up as high BR event vehicles or something though. Since both trees have a large arsenal of the more standard tanks (M1A1s, M1A2s if they go there, T-72s, T-80s, T-90s if they go there, etc.)
Obamenau Jan 6, 2019 @ 3:51am 
Originally posted by kamikazi21358:
I have a feeling though both 195 and the thumper may end up as high BR event vehicles or something though. Since both trees have a large arsenal of the more standard tanks (M1A1s, M1A2s if they go there, T-72s, T-80s, T-90s if they go there, etc.)

Aren't they superior to those though ?

I think that is the farthest available documentation allows us to go.
laughs in T-14 armata
Scarlet_Light Jan 6, 2019 @ 3:55am 
laughs in 2S25
basicly a obj 906 on STERIODS
Obamenau Jan 6, 2019 @ 3:56am 
Originally posted by The_Illuminati_Confirmed:
laughs in T-14 armata

Good luck on getting any info on that.
exactly, same with any leopard protoypes with 140mm guns. I think we could have an experimental tank event with all the prototypes that have ACTUALLY been constructed over the years that could be fun.
the M1 CATTB would be a VERY interetsing vehicle.
Originally posted by Creon:
Originally posted by Mindstream:

Good luck on getting any info on that.
I mean, we already have composite armor tanks in the game that go off estimations, so what's the problem exactly. Just slap on a stamp of approval, say you've got sekrit sources and leave it at that.
Ahh yes Sekrit dokuments, i've heard that the armata has 1000mm of RHA frontally LITERALLY.
we could use this combined with pixel measurements http://i.imgur.com/LZ29i24.jpg
edit: HOLY SH*T OBJ 195 had -10 degrees of gun depression, someone get this soviet tank some anti-depressants ASAP!
Last edited by The_Illuminati_Confirmed; Jan 6, 2019 @ 4:03am
kamikazi21358 Jan 6, 2019 @ 4:17am 
Originally posted by Mindstream:
I think that is the farthest available documentation allows us to go.
That’s an issue though, this is what I keep arguing.

We reached this point. We can’t go farther without accepting the fact that some nations will not have vehicles then.
Obamenau Jan 6, 2019 @ 4:39am 
Originally posted by kamikazi21358:
Originally posted by Mindstream:
I think that is the farthest available documentation allows us to go.
That’s an issue though, this is what I keep arguing.

We reached this point. We can’t go farther without accepting the fact that some nations will not have vehicles then.

Obviously, I only want to go as far as documentation allows.

But maybe we shouldn't at all since if only Germany, US and Russia have top tier vehicles that might be very unbalanced.

Originally posted by The_Illuminati_Confirmed:
Originally posted by Creon:
I mean, we already have composite armor tanks in the game that go off estimations, so what's the problem exactly. Just slap on a stamp of approval, say you've got sekrit sources and leave it at that.
Ahh yes Sekrit dokuments, i've heard that the armata has 1000mm of RHA frontally LITERALLY.

Everything ingame is based on at least some real documentation.
Obviously it's not all perfect but we already had that issue with ww2 tanks.
For things like Armata or leopard 2A7 there is NOTHING. That's just asking for trouble.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 16 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jan 6, 2019 @ 1:25am
Posts: 16