Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
so it doesn’t kill everything. It would have to be with M1A2 SEPs and stuff as you mentioned. But this is assuming they even go that modern.
Aren't they superior to those though ?
I think that is the farthest available documentation allows us to go.
Good luck on getting any info on that.
edit: HOLY SH*T OBJ 195 had -10 degrees of gun depression, someone get this soviet tank some anti-depressants ASAP!
We reached this point. We can’t go farther without accepting the fact that some nations will not have vehicles then.
Obviously, I only want to go as far as documentation allows.
But maybe we shouldn't at all since if only Germany, US and Russia have top tier vehicles that might be very unbalanced.
Everything ingame is based on at least some real documentation.
Obviously it's not all perfect but we already had that issue with ww2 tanks.
For things like Armata or leopard 2A7 there is NOTHING. That's just asking for trouble.