Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Some exceptions would be the Panzer III line, perhaps you should try that as you may like it. To a similar point in the case mate tank destroyer line — average mobility, but both good armor and good gun, in return for not having a turret.
Any tank can snipe, but German tanks can do it better. Their shell drop is lower, their APCBC retains better range penetration (or HEAT if using 7.5cm L/24s), etc.
German tanks are poor to the newer and lesser skilled, extremely good to those who get used to them and/or know how to use them.
As for the Jumbo, it’s probably the most debated tank in the game — don’t feel bad, it’s overpowered.
Pz IV/F2 you should be able to pen all T-34 in the front easily now KV-1 just aim for hatch or under ring turret which is easy cause of the long neck but i do see your point and i do feel it as well
but then i started playing british tanks and FML they have it worse off trust me
;(
Main advantage of it tends to be its reload that is the same as a Sherman firing a short 75 except its an 88.
Also, while accuracy stats aren't some thing that artificially nerfs a tank, velocity stats are a thing. Guns with lower velocity tend to be harder to aim with in general due to higher velocity guns having a higher margin of error when firing in which you can still hit your opponent.
EDIT: also the german Churchill is a hidden monster at its BR, very good armor when angled up and the gun is decent though not as likely to oneshot everything like one of the Panzer IVs. It seems as if you just would prefer a more armored tank, if that's the case then you'll like germany as you go up the tiers. Early tiers for armored german tanks you should go for the tank destroyers on the right hand side of the tree, starting at 4.7 they are pretty well armored for their BRs, after that go on up to 5.7 and have the Tiger I and Panther, Tiger I is great if you angle it, Panther has great frontal armor, both have exceptional guns. Once you get up to 6.7 you have a Tiger II H which is absolutely dominant at its own BR, though many people will complain about uptiers in them since they go from invulnerable to easy to pen with a full 1.0 uptiering.
The Churchill Mk.VII should be (and is) frontally immune to it.
Same with the Jumbo, historically those could resist fire from Tigers (which use the KwK 36, a better gun than the Flak 88)
Sure it may have 10 degrees of depression but it's on a sherman hull which is quite tall. Making the depression handle like you only have about 5 degrees. Unlike the lower chassis of the Pz IVs with their 10 degrees of depression.
Anyways, not to skip that the Cromwell has 12...
I couldn't remember off the top of my head so I looked at the wiki, could still be wrong though. Shame they dont share the depression of the Matilda with 20 degrees
I found Germany far better than bad to useless USA.
Guns are far better and shoot far more straight.
Try shooting a T20 or Jumbo gun it's like lobbing a softball!
Then you swith to a T34 and it shoots all the way across the map perfectly straight.
Panzer and Panther guns too. They're fantastic compared to what USA gets.
IMO Germany is not the best, Russia is the best by pretty far, but Germany is close second, and USA is deinitely last, after Brittain and France.
Since we’re talking about the F2, I personally think the Cromwell Mk.V is actually the best 3.3.
-Fast, fastest 3.3.
-75mm gun that kills most everything except for very heavy tanks, the 7.5cm L/43 is overkill.
-solid shot does more pinpoint sledgehammer like damage, in return for not exploding.
-like 60-70 some mm of armour, better than F2.
-12 degrees of depression.
Meanwhile the F2:
-average speed,
-special ability is it ignores armour, in return for having it’s armour ignored.
Which in a 1v1 with a Cromwell, I will take the Cromwell, since it is way faster, better rate of fire, 75mm is 1-2 hit kill regardless of solid shot, meanwhile the F2 ignores it’s armour, which wasn’t much to begin with, and it gets slapped by the 75mm easily.
Good mobility and guaranteed one shot kill on anything you face from any angle.
No aim required.
The KwK 36 was modified from the Flak 36 only in how bulky it was, the KwK was redesigned specifically to fit into the turret of a tank. The two guns shared identical ammunition and ballistic characteristics. And from tests they were both capable of (with APHE) penetrating 120mm sloped 30 from vertical at 100m, 110mm at 500m, 100mm at 1km. Quite self evidently, from normal engagement ranges that's never going to go through the front of a Jumbo, even at 100m it's going to be iffy as the Jumbo has 101mm sloped at 56 degrees from vertical.
Or to summarise for you, the Flak 36 was not some kind of God-cannon, it was in practical terms no different to the KwK 36, and was not even especially difficult to protect against.