Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MWmb5oEeWAM
(MiG-21, but you can clearly see little to no flames without the afterburner, while the afterburner has a large flame)
Meanwhile in game, for the MiG-19 and F-100 for example, there is very little difference between normal flight and afterburner, because of the regular jet exhaust already looks like what a jet engine looks like with an afterburner.
Also, they still use “WEP” for when you go afterburner, they didn’t even create new text for it.
Plus it looks stupid af.
what?