War Thunder

War Thunder

View Stats:
This topic has been locked
Remove machine guns from tanks.
Either the machine guns on tanks are unbalanced, or they just need to remove them. Destroying a tank with a machine gun round defeats the purpose of a tank. Cause there are no foot soldiers in the game.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 28 comments
Fsxlover2 Nov 30, 2018 @ 9:00am 
But then how are tanks gonna fight against aircraft?
trevorkrause (Banned) Nov 30, 2018 @ 9:01am 
Often the only gun i have in a heavy tank is the mg.
CT center Nov 30, 2018 @ 9:01am 
id rather they add MGs to the hulls of tanks that have them but currently dont work, plus italian tanks are amazing with MGs, the low tier one they showed has 4 MGs!
Legion Nov 30, 2018 @ 9:01am 
Originally posted by isomorphic_projection:
Either the machine guns on tanks are unbalanced, or they just need to remove them. Destroying a tank with a machine gun round defeats the purpose of a tank. Cause there are no foot soldiers in the game.
Troll harder.
TheActual-Swe Nov 30, 2018 @ 9:25am 
The guns are used to fight aircrafts dude
Ponto Nov 30, 2018 @ 9:27am 
Ummmmm,.....no thankyou.
kamikazi21358 Nov 30, 2018 @ 10:22am 
Nice b8 m8
HudsonM1A2 Nov 30, 2018 @ 10:23am 
I don't see the point of this suggestion. At one point, the tanks had nothing but the main and secondary cannons, no MGs. The majority of the community cheered when the MGs were added. And they have proved to be quite useful when facing aircraft, using them for ranging the main gun and even for finishing lightly armored vehicles. In fact, Mgs are quite better suited than most solid main gun rounds to take out vehicles with exposed crew members such as the M56 Scorpion as the firepower is enough and the rate of fire is miles away from any main cannon's.
gromchack Nov 30, 2018 @ 10:46am 
MG fire doesn't harm a medium or heavy tank, they can fulfill their purpose. Light tanks have an issue at close range and open tops or these russion AA trucks have an issue with MG fire at all, but this is according reality. Everything is ok in my eyes.
Obamenau Nov 30, 2018 @ 10:46am 
I swear this community will find a reason to remove litteraly anything
kamikazi21358 Nov 30, 2018 @ 11:05am 
Originally posted by Mindstream:
I swear this community will find a reason to remove litteraly anything
remov game
kamikazi21358 Nov 30, 2018 @ 11:06am 
Originally posted by Mirage:
Not really a fan of the MG spam every game as they're stupidly loud and heard from the opposite side of the map, same with planes where you can hear them from atleast 15km away.
Make MG ammo cost SL.
Problem solved.
RedSector73 Nov 30, 2018 @ 4:19pm 
Originally posted by kamikazi21358:
Originally posted by Mirage:
Not really a fan of the MG spam every game as they're stupidly loud and heard from the opposite side of the map, same with planes where you can hear them from atleast 15km away.
Make MG ammo cost SL.
Problem solved.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO and no
kamikazi21358 Nov 30, 2018 @ 4:34pm 
Originally posted by RedSector73:
Originally posted by kamikazi21358:
Make MG ammo cost SL.
Problem solved.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO and no
*continues to spam machine guns*
Doctor Eggman Nov 30, 2018 @ 5:08pm 
Originally posted by isomorphic_projection:
Either the machine guns on tanks are unbalanced, or they just need to remove them. Destroying a tank with a machine gun round defeats the purpose of a tank. Cause there are no foot soldiers in the game.

I think they should remove "hit" indicators for artillery.

MG's are fine for spotting mechanics, but random RNG artillery that the commander somehow knows "hit" a tank from across the map? Just no.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 28 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Nov 30, 2018 @ 8:59am
Posts: 28