Silent nerf on the fw 190 c

[un.Casual]

It is absolutely garbage now.

[Furina De Fontaine]

Just stop making these kinds of posts. There is no such thing as a "silent nerf" as not a single person who claims this has ever proved it to be true. Along with the fact that changelogs are always announced on the War Thunder main page.

[un.Casual]

Originally posted by ✯Σ✯ Dawncloud:

Just stop making these kinds of posts. There is no such thing as a "silent nerf" as not a single person who claims this has ever proved it to be true. Along with the fact that changelogs are always announced on the War Thunder main page.

Actually the climb rate of the fw C used to be 22 Meters if I recall and it's been changed to 15 so lol.

[Illusionyary]

I think it got it's proper FM instead of a "nerf" (it was using a placeholder FM previously). That being said it should be like 3.7, not 5.3.

Afaik the armament is still wrong too, why does it have the hole for the 30mm in the prop shaft but doesn't get it ingame or am I missing something?

[CT center]

Originally posted by ✯Σ✯ Dawncloud:

Just stop making these kinds of posts. There is no such thing as a "silent nerf" as not a single person who claims this has ever proved it to be true. Along with the fact that changelogs are always announced on the War Thunder main page.

they always do things quietly, an example of this is the panther, they buffed the armour in 1.85 then nerfed it again some time after.

[Franss the Coffee Addict]

Originally posted by CT center:

Originally posted by ✯Σ✯ Dawncloud:

Just stop making these kinds of posts. There is no such thing as a "silent nerf" as not a single person who claims this has ever proved it to be true. Along with the fact that changelogs are always announced on the War Thunder main page.

they always do things quietly, an example of this is the panther, they buffed the armour in 1.85 then nerfed it again some time after.

Don't forget the magical nerf on hesh and thne trying to explain it with their ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ excuse of a reasearch that was completely in Russian

[un.Casual]

They turned the fw from an excellent 5.3 into a bad plane that at it's powerless state belongs at 3.4 to 4.2

[NAF-5th.Legion-Waffen.Div]

Originally posted by ✯Σ✯ Dawncloud:

Just stop making these kinds of posts. There is no such thing as a "silent nerf" as not a single person who claims this has ever proved it to be true. Along with the fact that changelogs are always announced on the War Thunder main page.

oh dude you are wrong on so many levels, gaijin has a long history of silent nerfs/buffs, and the changelog hardly ever includes all the changes they do, they even state it at the end of the changelog.

[Illusionyary]

Originally posted by un.Casual:

They turned the fw from an excellent 5.3 into a bad plane that at it's powerless state belongs at 3.4 to 4.2

Neither of those are actual BRs but it always had awful performance. It was never a 5.3 plane.

[un.Casual]

Originally posted by Illusionyary:

Originally posted by un.Casual:

They turned the fw from an excellent 5.3 into a bad plane that at it's powerless state belongs at 3.4 to 4.2

Neither of those are actual BRs but it always had awful performance. It was never a 5.3 plane.

Nope it used to be awesome in the first five days like 25 metre climb fast guns and the second air intake acted as a giant coolant module

[SuperbPledget]

Originally posted by Illusionyary:

I think it got it's proper FM instead of a "nerf" (it was using a placeholder FM previously). That being said it should be like 3.7, not 5.3.

Afaik the armament is still wrong too, why does it have the hole for the 30mm in the prop shaft but doesn't get it ingame or am I missing something?

And did it really have the 2 cannons in 1 side and the machine guns in the other? Or was it more like machine guns in the nose and cannons in the wings?
The way it is now is just weird, with the 2 151s in one side and the MGs in the other

[Illusionyary]

Originally posted by JotAfonso:

And did it really have the 2 cannons in 1 side and the machine guns in the other? Or was it more like machine guns in the nose and cannons in the wings?
The way it is now is just weird, with the 2 151s in one side and the MGs in the other

That's a bug, it's meant to have 2x 13mm MGs in the nose and 2x MG 151s in the wings then a 30mm through the prop.

[un.Casual]

Originally posted by Illusionyary:

Originally posted by JotAfonso:

And did it really have the 2 cannons in 1 side and the machine guns in the other? Or was it more like machine guns in the nose and cannons in the wings?
The way it is now is just weird, with the 2 151s in one side and the MGs in the other

That's a bug, it's meant to have 2x 13mm MGs in the nose and 2x MG 151s in the wings then a 30mm through the prop.

Now that sounds usable

[Illusionyary]

Originally posted by un.Casual:

Now that sounds usable

I have no idea why it doesn't have this armament in-game, if you look at the 3D model the prop hub has the cutout hole for the 30mm to go but it's not there...

[Shimozukachi]

Originally posted by Illusionyary:

Originally posted by un.Casual:

Now that sounds usable

I have no idea why it doesn't have this armament in-game, if you look at the 3D model the prop hub has the cutout hole for the 30mm to go but it's not there...

not sure, but what if they've used an existing prop hub because it's cheaper than creating one without the hole?

[SuperbPledget]

Originally posted by Illusionyary:

Originally posted by JotAfonso:

And did it really have the 2 cannons in 1 side and the machine guns in the other? Or was it more like machine guns in the nose and cannons in the wings?
The way it is now is just weird, with the 2 151s in one side and the MGs in the other

That's a bug, it's meant to have 2x 13mm MGs in the nose and 2x MG 151s in the wings then a 30mm through the prop.

Makes a lot more sense with the 13mm instead of the 7.92 aswell, thanks for clarifying.
Hope they fix the whole thing soon.