T32E1 heavy tank

[sneakybass]

At 7.7 this tank can't really do anything good this tank needs a stronger shell M348 like in all 7.0 s In the American line up better optics faster reload just a better shell would be nice, If you like exchanging fire with enemy tanks and jumping back to hide this Is the tank for you. You will have shells boucing off your tank maybe three shells before you can get to cover or reload and this tank Is speed is not bad, tank needs at least a shell like In most 7.0 tanks the m348 shells are better than these. This tank does not know what It wants to be try It you will see what I mean shoot over a thousand yards Is a crap shoot Its worthless at long range and the optics gees...........M46 Is a way better tank hell for what Its worth get the m103 and really kick a!@...........Kind of disappointed only one tank and Its not really that nice Its got armor so we have to give you not so good shells and optics and your going to move very slow no smoke no artillary and the worse optics I have seen In a while what good Is this tank when my m-46 has better shells and can get out of harms way faster, I for got to say the machine gun does not elevate high enough so when you have a plane dive bombing you with bombs your out of luck, most airplanes come In at a higher angle..........

[Dakota]

Its basically a 7.0 Jumbo, gun that can manage at its BR but is still worse than others and armor that bounces most things at its BR. The HVAP is pretty important to keep around, lets you punch through Maus turrets when you get uptiered, otherwise just load the APHE. I personally haven't had any issues with it being slow or having bad optics and I don't have the engine, filters, or transmission upgrades.

[Dakota]

Originally posted by Mirage:

Already an improved T32 without any BR increase.. 6.7/7.0 always a bad BR.

To be fair, they're basically the same tank, one has an MG port weakspot, the other has a weakspot in the armor seam.

[KissHUN *;--;*]

Originally posted by Mirage:

Originally posted by Dakota:

To be fair, they're basically the same tank, one has an MG port weakspot, the other has a weakspot in the armor seam.

Haven't closely inspected it, but the front plate is a lot tougher and without the MG spot a lot better.. way stronger than a Tiger 2.

the lower front plate weakspots also gone in the left and right side.

[RAM AIR IV]

I'd say make the reload 12 seconds base and 9 seconds ace and we'd be good

[sneakybass]

Originally posted by RAM AIR IV:

I'd say make the reload 12 seconds base and 9 seconds ace and we'd be good

I have this tank ACED no where near 9 seconds reload and have every thing researched but you will find out.....

[Dakota]

Originally posted by Mirage:

Originally posted by Dakota:

To be fair, they're basically the same tank, one has an MG port weakspot, the other has a weakspot in the armor seam.

Haven't closely inspected it, but the front plate is a lot tougher and without the MG spot a lot better.. way stronger than a Tiger 2.

Its around 50mm more effective frontal plate armor than the Tiger 2, turret is much stronger but the gun ends up taking twice the time to reload and the Tiger 2 H is a lower BR anyway, so sort of a trade off anyway.

[RAM AIR IV]

Originally posted by You Die0244:

Originally posted by RAM AIR IV:

I'd say make the reload 12 seconds base and 9 seconds ace and we'd be good

I have this tank ACED no where near 9 seconds reload and have every thing researched but you will find out.....

Yea ik. The aced reload is 14.5 seconds. I'm saying that it should be 9