Swedish tanks and Pictures on them!

[SwedishStyle97]

So some people have no idea about that we Swedes build our own tanks.

So i was thinking to write down a tank and a picture of the tank so some people can see what tanks we build during the years :)

Btw there is more tanks but i decided to upload some that i think will interest some people!

Strv m/40K
https://www.net-maquettes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Strv-M40-43.jpg

Ikv 72
http://wiki.gcdn.co/images/0/07/Ikv_72_production_version.jpg

Pvkv m/43 (1946)
http://www.ointres.se/pvkv_m43-6.JPG

Strv m/42
https://i.imgur.com/EUofkFM.jpg

And Strv m/42 "Delat Torn"
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/9e/c5/23/9ec523c3ead5343f8f10c5daaea8ebb5.jpg

Landsverk L-62 ANTI II
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Finnish_AA_tank.jpg

Lvkv fm/43 (1947)
https://i.imgur.com/rRG47so.jpg

[SwedishStyle97]

Ikv 72
Armor:
Front: 18,5 mm
Side: 6 mm
Rear: 12 mm
Roof: 5 mm
Floor: 9,5 mm


Armament: 7,5 cm kan m/41 Ikv
Gun elevation/depression: +20/-20 dg
Gun traverse: +-10 dg
Ammo: 42 rounds 10,5 cm
Note: Carries 10 smoke grenades



Penetration @ 90 dg (AP:

10 m: 82 mm
100 m: 79 mm
500 m: 70 mm
1000 m: 59 mm
1500 m: 50 mm
2000 m: 43 mm

[SwedishStyle97]

Originally posted by AK Rowling:

Also I'd just like to point out. He thought Bofors was British. LOL. He thought perhaps the most famous AA gun in history was a British design. Perhaps you think the standard service rifle in the British army is an AK-74 aswell? What a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ imbecile.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bofors

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dJDn5F1GQk

I'm sorry but idiots like him piss me off. Ain't my fault it was a really good AA gun and everyone wanted to use it.

You can be calm he is just hating. Coming with fake facts doesen't work here.

[Stridswombat]

Yeah but I see people like him all the time. It gets really grating having to defend the truth constantly against people that are willfully ignorant.

[StingerRPG]

What are you trying to accomplish? If you really want to be constructive, go ahead and pay a visit to the official forums instead and do the suggestions yourself. Not here where the people who matter will never visit.

[SwedishStyle97]

Originally posted by AK Rowling:

Yeah but I see people like him all the time. It gets really grating having to defend the truth constantly against people that are willfully ignorant.

I know you feeling. I really hate this people.

[SwedishStyle97]

Originally posted by StingerRPG:

What are you trying to accomplish? If you really want to be constructive, go ahead and pay a visit to the official forums instead and do the suggestions yourself. Not here where the people who matter will never visit.

You talking to me?

[Stridswombat]

Originally posted by StingerRPG:

What are you trying to accomplish? If you really want to be constructive, go ahead and pay a visit to the official forums instead and do the suggestions yourself. Not here where the people who matter will never visit.

What's the harm in discussion? It's already on the forums. Multiple posts in fact. We're just passionate about tanks and want to see the ones designed close to home represented in the game.

Don't everyone that play Warthunder have that in common? I would think so.

[CT center]

Originally posted by AK Rowling:

Originally posted by CT center:

you do understand it is my opinion right? im not trying to convert you to my way of thinking? i didnt research the history of sweden before writing this.

to the above because i cant be arsed messing around with comments.

Strv m/40K it had up to 15mm of armour and goes up to 28mph, it is one of the slowest tanks of the tier and the lighest tank of the tier, it could pen around 56mm while also facing hull break

I'm going to stop reading right here. Where the ♥♥♥♥ are you getting your information on? Because nearly everythign you're saying is wrong.

Stridsvagn m/40K has up to 30mm+ applique armour added to it. It's frontal hull thickness was 48mm and the turret front was 50mm. It had a topspeed of 45 km/h.

37mm Bofors cannons has according to Finnish records a penetration of 33mm at 500m against a 60 degree angle. When compared to a 37mm M6 cannon mounted on a late Stuart it comes up to 25mm of penetration with AP and 30mm with APCBC. 37mm Bofors guns also had both AP and APHE shells.

No light tanks in the game like it can be hull broken.

https://i.imgur.com/wGSvjbY.jpg

This is taken straight from the archives.

Basically nearly everything you said is wrong and you're doing nothing but spreading misinformation. You're being a jack ass.

Blame Wikipedia, oh but no blame me for using misleading info even though I honestly don't give a ♥♥♥♥ and don't want to search for 2 weeks for the info.
Unlike you, swedishstyle97 has actually been helpful and corrected my incorrect acknowledgement of it, and I thank him for that, instead of doing what you did and go " heh, ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥, you're wrong" and giving 0 information on the stuff, nothing to prove me right/wrong.

Again, thank you swedishstyle97 for the helpful info.
Tbf the low tier stuff would be nice if gaijin decide to do a multi-nation tree, where the tree would have considerable numbers of vehicles.

[SwedishStyle97]

No Problem!
Wikipedia has some wrong answer on tanks. But this guy who made the tree has done it by Documents.
Atleast i hope the will be a Swedish tech tree because it will have the best Depression xD

[Stridswombat]

I did a whole post correcting you but you refused to believe information that could be so easily verified in a million different ways. I'm not sure how you even came to such wrongful conclusions in the first place.

Aside from literally providing the actual armour values taken straight from Swedish army archives and declassified.

Maybe next time you're wrong and refuse to accept don't be so condescending about it and I might not call you out on it.

[CT center]

Originally posted by AK Rowling:

I did a whole post correcting you but you refused to believe information that could be so easily verified in a million different ways. I'm not sure how you even came to such wrongful conclusions in the first place.

Aside from literally providing the actual armour values taken straight from Swedish army archives and declassified.

Maybe next time you're wrong and refuse to accept don't be so condescending about it and I might not call you out on it.

when i find info such as how 2 version of the tank were lend-leased to india and the US, you just going "no" doesnt really help me, yk?

[Stridswombat]

Firstly, that information has to actually be correct to be valid. Secondly I explained how that wasn't the case, thirdly what tank are you even speaking of?

Because Ikv 91 was built by Hägglunds och Söner on request from the Swedish army for a light, mobile and amphibious vehicle capable of defeating armour to be issued to the infantry battalions. No one else has ever used it.

Ikv 105 was a prototype marketed to India for potential sale. The US also has a look at it, but they only did tests with it and neither country adopted or bought it.

No country other than Sweden used either and they were both designed and built in Sweden by a Swedish company. I don't see ANYTHING here to suggest it being anything but a Swedish vehicle.

[SwedishStyle97]

Originally posted by CT center:

Originally posted by AK Rowling:

I did a whole post correcting you but you refused to believe information that could be so easily verified in a million different ways. I'm not sure how you even came to such wrongful conclusions in the first place.

Aside from literally providing the actual armour values taken straight from Swedish army archives and declassified.

Maybe next time you're wrong and refuse to accept don't be so condescending about it and I might not call you out on it.

when i find info such as how 2 version of the tank were lend-leased to india and the US, you just going "no" doesnt really help me, yk?

The part when you talked about the Spaa with 2 Bofors gun.
I think you mean the L-61 ANTI I

The L-62 ANTI was a spaag based on a extended L-60 light tank chassis. Plans for its development started as early as 1931 with the first produced vehicle being completed in 1936 this made it perhaps the first self propelled anti air vehicle on a tank chassis. In 1938 a prototype along with a licence for production was sold to Hungary where a modified version with a enlarged turret entered service as the M40 Nimrod.

The L-62 ANTI II
Improved version of the L-62 ANTI design more closely based on the Strv m/40L design. 6 units were produced for Finland during ww2 where they served untill 1966.

[Stridswombat]

It should be noted that while Finland used them, they were designed, built and sold to them by Sweden.

[CT center]

Originally posted by AK Rowling:

It should be noted that while Finland used them, they were designed, built and sold to them by Sweden.

its mix-matched in this game, if youre going by that then the french should not have the m10 or m4a3e2 and the british should not have the m22.