安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
There is nothing wrong with APHE, it is a realistic feature.
ANARCHY
The AP solid shot ammunition would penetrate the tank, creating a cone of shrapnel and the shell itself would break apart into several large chunks often, exactly like how it does in game.
APHE in game goes into the tank and does nearly the same thing, but when it gets to the center and explodes, the shell stops in mid air and just releases shrapnel in air, like an explosive going off inside the tank. However, this is not how APHE works:
When the shell enters the tank, it does almost exactly the same thing as solid shot, creating a cone of shrapnel. But when the APHE explodes, it is NOT designed to send shrapnel everywhere. The shell already has inertia and is still traveling; what the shell does is reaches the point and the explosion breaks apart the shell, not into several large chunks, but sends a much wider dispersion or smaller chunks in a much wider cone down the tank. However, this does NOT send pieces in a 360 degree direction nor back to the front of the tank, nor when say penetrating a cupola, this does NOT send pieces strait down.
Basically, upon penetration, both create the cone of death as spalling from the armor are sent in all directions. BUT, the difference between the shells post penetration:
Basically, solid shot is a buckshot, APHE is a bird shot. At no point, APHE does not send shrapnel in a 360 degree direction destroying everything.
Hullbreak is there so it doesn't have higher survivability than an actually armored vehicle.
Why should you have to aim properly against lightly armoured vehicles when you don't against averagely armoured vehicles? Thin armour is supposed to be a bad thing.
2. But they literally do at times have higher survivability.
A lot of heavy tanks don't even have enough armour to reliably with stand anti-tank guns at anything short of long range.
All the armour on most tanks serves to do is spall and detonate APHE.
But even when I play, for example, the Panther. I don't trust it to bounce even US 76mm guns at medium ranges, let alone French, British, or Soviet guns.