Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also, TS has been given up. And WR doesn't mean everything.
Is what I'd say if I were Pacifica.
They say they’re experiementing with supersonic physics and stuff (but nothing is guaranteed), but to be honest I hope they go rank 6 with jets by going full 1950s (MiG-17Fs, MiG-19s, F100s, etc.) - maybe then they expand the BR to 10.0, then decompress and balance 7.0-9.0...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHbT6BjFvcA
this has been discussed to death, as have been other " Mig17 Hunter, or X airplane is OP" please Ner or balance.
theres is nothing to be done here. Giving other nations even better aircraft will actually tilt the power of balance drastically in the other direction. Where the Cla mk5a has some minor advnatages, Giving USA say an F86H10 or Russia Mig17F would totally be powercreep. and force extended tier 5 if not tier 6 content for everyone.
My idea is hopefully if they do early supersonic jets like they’re thinking about, basically open up the entire 1950s, maybe this means they’ll br decompress the entire range to say 10.0 or 11.0, and actually fix the stupid imbalances at 7.0-8.0, and the dumb all 8.0s only or 9.0s only system. I don’t care how they do it, just decompress to 10.0 and make the whole range more diverse. Add more non-supersonic jets of the equivalent strengths if lack of jets is the only problem to the inability of not having 6.3 to 9.0 fully fit. A Me 262A should never be the same br as a F-84, a Me262C should never be the same br as a G.91, and a MiG-15 or whatever should never be the same BR as a Hunter F1 or a Cl-13 or whatever - they need at minimum a full br of decompression: either add more jets so decompression will be easier to do, or just do it; the point is fix it!
The Me262 C1a and C2b were built to intercept bombers and were tested in early 1945. They probably would have entered service in late 1945 or early 1946. They have a great climb rate for 3 minutes only. You already have to spend 30 seconds of that to take off and get to speed. That does not justify a 7.0 plane to be 8.0. As for manouvers; it only turns better at low speeds between 450-550 kph. Since most 8.0 and 9.0 jets fly and and turn at speeds where the elevator of the 262 locks up this is not an advantage.
Also: the CL-13 is only a few kph faster than other sabres.
Its the speed of the MiG, the dive and climb of a Hunter with he agility of a Sabre, its insane, its got no weakness, it can beat you everywhere.
back to the topic, gaijin had many chances to change the BR and add a few top tier jets to give some resemblance of 'balance' but they F'd it up more by giving allies vs axis in a cold war setting and maps so small that USN jets are like fish in a CL13's barrel.
Like even when im the last one left ina 1v3 i feel like i can win.