Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
With the T-10M, its stock APCBC can essentially deal with anything it faces (only real ones that will be able to withstand it being the XM-1 and Chieftain Mk.10 turrets) and the reverse speed plus the quite good reload mean you can knock somebody out and quickly reverse to reload then pop out again shortly after and repeat.
Just ask yourself this: Do you really want to potentially face a Leo 2A4, Type 90, or M1 Abrams in a slightly better T-54?
No APFSDS no fun, besides at that BR range the T-10M might be heavy but it will still get one-shotted like cardboard box full of sardines.
Another problem is that if you use T-10M with T-62M then uptiering into 9.3 is lot worse then uptiering into 9.0.
What difference does it make, T-10M crew is packed together like sardines all surrounded by ammo racks and modules, one shot with APFSDS and you are goner.
Reload time has nothing to cheer about either at that BR.
And if you think you get downtiered with 8.3 tank then good luck with that.
Yeah it would be lot more useful at 8.0.
The armor is how it was IRL. don't know what you want.
What it really needs is the loading assistant for a faster reload.
However if it's an option just go for the T-62. Many people seem to like it and it's far more competitive in an uptier.