Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/6wz64g/maus_apds_mythbusting_with_sources/
Mainly the Panther II I mention because 1. I hear it is bad, and 2. Because it looks bad. The reason I say it looks bad is from my experience of fighting it, it poses zero threat whatsoever. It’s slower than a T-44, it has about the same armor as the T-44 .7 br higher, it’s 88mm gun tickles many tanks it fights from the front, the tank is pretty easy to hit, the only good thing about the tank really is it’s front 100mm plate can bounce a shell if it’s angled while backing into cover, but otherwise it’s turret is a guarantee 3/5 crew down and modules in it, it’s lower plate is a 1 hit 80% of the time, it’s 88mm does not have the penetration for me to fear it, nor the reload of the Tiger II to put enough shells down range to hit a weak spot if it doesn’t hit one with the first shell and before I blow it’s @$$ back to Berlin; from the perspective of a player who fights the Panther II, and from many accounts I hear from people who do, the tank is pathetic.
Alternatively with tracer: APFSCBCHEDS-T