t92 should be moved to 6.0

[cpl trout]

6.7 is way to high

[Solaire of Astora]

Oprindeligt skrevet af RAM AIR IV:

6.3 also sounds nice for the Super Pershing and 6.0 sounds nice for the regular m26

I would agree with that

[RRG_181917]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Solaire of Astora:

Oprindeligt skrevet af RAM AIR IV:

6.3 sounds nice for it

Yea I agree, 6.3 for T92 and a few other tanks like AMX-50 would be perfect. ST-A1 and A2 I think should be 6.0 but I havent played those since ♥♥♥ tanks first came out and not sure if they are still as horrible as they were back then.

yes, they're still ass. they suffer really bad from stock syndrome. i've experienced the same with the type 74, so much so i almost dont even want to use it...

[RAM AIR IV]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Solaire of Astora:

Oprindeligt skrevet af RAM AIR IV:

6.3 also sounds nice for the Super Pershing and 6.0 sounds nice for the regular m26

I would agree with that

And might as well lower the reload on the Americans t34 to 16 seconds instead of 18

[TaxFraudTodd]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Solaire of Astora:

Oprindeligt skrevet af RAM AIR IV:

6.3 sounds nice for it

Yea I agree, 6.3 for T92 and a few other tanks like AMX-50 would be perfect. ST-A1 and A2 I think should be 6.0 but I havent played those since ♥♥♥ tanks first came out and not sure if they are still as horrible as they were back then.

I played a bit of the sta1 and its okay at 6.3 with HEATFS being what it is. its just another one of those tanks you have to play smart with

[Solaire of Astora]

Oprindeligt skrevet af ToddTheTroll2142:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Solaire of Astora:

Yea I agree, 6.3 for T92 and a few other tanks like AMX-50 would be perfect. ST-A1 and A2 I think should be 6.0 but I havent played those since ♥♥♥ tanks first came out and not sure if they are still as horrible as they were back then.

I played a bit of the sta1 and its okay at 6.3 with HEATFS being what it is. its just another one of those tanks you have to play smart with

Biggest issues that I had with the STA1 and A2 during when I played it was when AP shot and pretty much all american rounds during that time were under that heavy nerf that ruined alot of allied tanks until recently.

[Wiesell]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Solaire of Astora:

Oprindeligt skrevet af RAM AIR IV:

6.3 sounds nice for it

Yea I agree, 6.3 for T92 and a few other tanks like AMX-50 would be perfect. ST-A1 and A2 I think should be 6.0 but I havent played those since ♥♥♥ tanks first came out and not sure if they are still as horrible as they were back then.

yeah soviet tanks will suffer from it

[Squirtbottle]

Please no, the T92 stock grind is absolute hell, but once it has APDS it is a perfect 6.7 light tank. Don't ever make it lower or else it will clobber the enemy in RB...It has every advantage over the Walker Bulldog after mobility upgrades are done since the Bulldog is quite a large light tank, so it is spotted much more often. The T92 can be nearly invisible in many cases (without bushes) and it is a great flanking vehicle with a decent gun after APDS.

[Arc]

Well, there is no difference between T92 and M41A1 in terms of how bad/good the tank is. Though this applies to pretty much any US tank including whole M4 line, etc. they are for some non-existent reason overtiered.

HEAT-FS with same crappy performance is on PT-76 and that ain't on 6.7..

76mm M4 sherman just about matches long barreled 75mm Pz4 G/H yet is 5.0 - 5.3 instead of 4.3 - 4.7.

M4-75mm is spread from 3.3 to 4.3 for no real reason. Yet Pz4 F2 which is pretty much the same is 3.7.

This ain't about whining, this is about factual in-game performance excluding player skill which is for some reason accounted for in Gaijin's statistics, there's no denying that Ger. tank tree is much easier to grind so more unskilled ppl will play it, US is pita all the way so there'll be less unskilled ppl to grind it.
This should not be accounted for in statistics as it pretty much ruins US tanks.

[Narf]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Arc:

HEAT-FS with same crappy performance is on PT-76 and that ain't on 6.7..

I already talked about that:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Narf:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Jeric_83:

and why is the PT76 B with a similar gun, ammo and reload at 5.3?

Because the PT has less than half the gun depression, its best pen ammo has 32mm less pen and the crappy post-pen damage of HEATFS, the significantly less sloped armor makes it way easier to kill with machine guns and the gun reload is nearly double that of the T92 at 11.1s stock. A stupid comparison, really. The T92 outperforms it in every regard.

And I'll repeat myself: that's a stupid comparison. Nobody uses HEATFS on the T92 anyways when they have APDS unlocked, and even then the T92 still has other significant advantages over the PT to make a comparison nonsense.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Arc:

76mm M4 sherman just about matches long barreled 75mm Pz4 G/H yet is 5.0 - 5.3 instead of 4.3 - 4.7.

M4-75mm is spread from 3.3 to 4.3 for no real reason. Yet Pz4 F2 which is pretty much the same is 3.7.

The M79 ammo has 20mm more pen than the PzGr 39 and is totally viable after the AP buff, the M4 is significantly better armored than the Pz IV even in its non-jumbo version and it is sloped which means there's a chance for bounces which the Pz IV's boxy design doesn't have. And the .50 cal roof gun can kill quite a few armored vehicles and low flying planes. And the 75mm cannons have less reload than the German ones, with the 76mm being at the same reload time as the Germans while having better pen.
So there are plenty of reasons for those BRs.