Why is M36 GMC at 5.7

[Indigo_Python]

I dont think the M36 should be at 5.7 because it is worse then the T25 and its not that great as backup either because of its slow speed and total lack of armor.

[83athom]

Its actually got some good armor if you angle and know how to position yourself, and it is really fast when upgraded and going in lines. Also, it has a really nice 90mm gun.

[Rei]

The main attraction is the gun. US tank destroyers are lightly armored with good guns. Don't play it for the armor or speed. Don't play it at all if you don't like it.

[AttackerCat]

Originally posted by Rootin Tootin Putin:

The main attraction is the gun. US tank destroyers are lightly armored with good guns. Don't play it for the armor or speed. Don't play it at all if you don't like it.

It is a great 90mm.

Other than the gun and the electrical turret traverse, it's just an M10 and should be played with caution and care. But it will still eat enemy armor alive.

[Colonel Jason]

Originally posted by NoBombDrop:

I dont think the M36 should be at 5.7 because it is worse then the T25 and its not that great as backup either because of its slow speed and total lack of armor.

It is used to 6.3,you should be thankful it is 5.7 now.

[Bluefromnowhere]

I think that, like the Marder with the long 75mm having a lower BR than the tank that first gets that gun (Pz4 F2), the M36 should be slightly lower than the T25 and be at 5.3 rather than 5.7.

[Omega Sirius]

Originally posted by NoBombDrop:

I dont think the M36 should be at 5.7 because it is worse then the T25 and its not that great as backup either because of its slow speed and total lack of armor.

becuz it suks at 6.0

[Arc]

Be glad that T25 is at 5.7 in RB, because for some non-existent reason it's 6.0 for AB.

And if you take a look at M26, it's the same crap-tank as T25 but on 6.3 because Russian bias Object 120 is totally not dominating at 7.7 now that overmatch/hull break is not being applied to it HAHA