Su-6 5.3 Attacker. How is it?

[Ragnarok]

Alright so, I was looking at this vehicle and it interested me. So I wanted to test the rockets. I picked up the IL-2 test and... I didn't like it. The rockets were angled upwards so hitting tanks was difficult.

Same for the su-6 or are the rockets situated better?

[Shard]

引用自 Barneys Had Enough Of You.：

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1732655819 IL-2M type 3 rockets

vs


https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1732655777 Fockwolfe.


See the difference?

I have to know if the SU-6 is just like the IL or is it the fockwolfe. The IL rockets on the SPECIFIC plane shoot VERY much upwards.

Alright, I used all the IL-2's up to the first SU-6. Here is how it is:

IL-2M type 3 shoots rockets upwards
IL-2-37 doesn't have any :(

All others have the standard line of fire (like on the FW). IL-2M type 3 is the only weird one, it doesn't have anything to do with settings. When you look at it in hangar with rockets equipped you can clearly see that they are tilted way more upwards. All others shoot their rockets in the same standard way and have them in the same position. The SU-6 also shoots directly forward; not upwards (though they can be a bit harder to aim because the SU-6 is way faster).

Keep in mind that the RBS-82 rockets have less drop than the RBS-132, so this can also potentially change your results.

[Ragnarok]

Ok, so thank you shards. If this is right, its just the PLANE itself. So the SU-6 will still be a good option.

[kamikazi21358]

Yeah, nvm, I have the same think with the il-2M type 3.

Aircraft that don’t have this, that I know of:

IL-2 obr. 1943 (amazing Il-2, best of them all)

IL-2 obr. 1941

IL-10 obr. 1946

Su-6

[Ragnarok]

引用自 kamikazi21358：

Yeah, nvm, I have the same think with the il-2M type 3.

Aircraft that don’t have this, that I know of:

IL-2 obr. 1943 (amazing Il-2, best of them all)

IL-2 obr. 1941

IL-10 obr. 1946

Su-6

Then thats good. Im hoping the rockets are worth using on the Su-6.