War Thunder

War Thunder

檢視統計資料:
Omega Sirius 2018 年 1 月 4 日 下午 11:22
Please Change Panthers BR!!!
Make all the Panthers 5.7 and Panther 2 6.7.
The Panther 2 doesn't belong in 7.0, hell the Tiger 2 H is better than Panther 2, and it's 6.7 like wtf Gaijin???
< >
目前顯示第 1-15 則留言,共 42
Blitzkrieg Wulf  [開發人員] 2018 年 1 月 4 日 下午 11:34 
引用自 Omega Sirius
Make all the Panthers 5.7 and Panther 2 6.7.
The Panther 2 doesn't belong in 7.0, hell the Tiger 2 H is better than Panther 2, and it's 6.7 like wtf Gaijin???

I must be the only person that thinks the 2H/Diesel Tiger steam-rolls when played competently, and can even punch above it's weight more often than not.

Probably alone in thinking that the Panther II was the bully on the block at 6.7, too.

Just my $0.02.
最後修改者:Blitzkrieg Wulf; 2018 年 1 月 4 日 下午 11:35
Captain Jed 2018 年 1 月 4 日 下午 11:55 
引用自 Blitzkrieg Wulf
引用自 Omega Sirius
Make all the Panthers 5.7 and Panther 2 6.7.
The Panther 2 doesn't belong in 7.0, hell the Tiger 2 H is better than Panther 2, and it's 6.7 like wtf Gaijin???

I must be the only person that thinks the 2H/Diesel Tiger steam-rolls when played competently, and can even punch above it's weight more often than not.

Probably alone in thinking that the Panther II was the bully on the block at 6.7, too.

Just my $0.02.
You're not the only person.
Panther 2 does more than well at its current BR. You have to play like an idiot to not get a kill, or die at the start of a match.
Same with both the 2H and Diesel Tiger. They steam roll and completely dominate 6.7.

Furthering that, all the Panthers are pretty decent where they are.
My opinion, at least.
Rei 2018 年 1 月 4 日 下午 11:57 
Panther 2 is okay at its BR, it's like a faster, lighter, and more mobile Tiger 2. The rest of the Panthers are in a interesting position. The gun will start to lack a bit, but if you put them at 5.7 they'll be with the Panther D, which is a worse tank.
Vriz 2018 年 1 月 4 日 下午 11:59 
引用自 Blitzkrieg Wulf
引用自 Omega Sirius
Make all the Panthers 5.7 and Panther 2 6.7.
The Panther 2 doesn't belong in 7.0, hell the Tiger 2 H is better than Panther 2, and it's 6.7 like wtf Gaijin???

I must be the only person that thinks the 2H/Diesel Tiger steam-rolls when played competently, and can even punch above it's weight more often than not.

Probably alone in thinking that the Panther II was the bully on the block at 6.7, too.

Just my $0.02.
You're not alone but to be fair, it was only just a year ago that the playerbase for Germany had to start to learn to aim at weakspots when the T29 (and later IS-6) came into play ;)

Think we just need more time is all :3
xROKSTARx 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 12:12 
引用自 Omega Sirius
Make all the Panthers 5.7 and Panther 2 6.7.
The Panther 2 doesn't belong in 7.0, hell the Tiger 2 H is better than Panther 2, and it's 6.7 like wtf Gaijin???

You need to take in to consideration that the Panther II is now 7.0 because the tank was absolutely clubbing at 6.7 with it being the best all rounded tank for the BR in the game. It was hard to penetrate with any gun unless you fired HEAT, HEATFS, or APDS(British guns only as far as I know) so that you could pen the hull or firing any HE filled shell you had to stop and aim for the turret meanwhile the tank's 88mm could pen almost anywhere on any vehicle within its BR bracket. The tank was one of the fastest(both in acceleration and top speed), one of the better armored, has arguably the best gun in the 6.7 bracket(which at the time included the Is-2 mod 44 with the post war APCBC and the M46 without HEATFS), and great reverse to get out of a bad situation. That is why the Panther II is 7.0 and the only reason the Panther D is 5.7 is because of the awful turret traverse it has while the rest have the same great gun, only improved, with a much better turret traverse and better armor in the case of the Panther G while the Panther F has the same turret as the Panther II just fitted with the 75mm gun.
最後修改者:xROKSTARx; 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 12:15
Omega Sirius 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 12:13 
引用自 Vriz
引用自 Blitzkrieg Wulf

I must be the only person that thinks the 2H/Diesel Tiger steam-rolls when played competently, and can even punch above it's weight more often than not.

Probably alone in thinking that the Panther II was the bully on the block at 6.7, too.

Just my $0.02.
You're not alone but to be fair, it was only just a year ago that the playerbase for Germany had to start to learn to aim at weakspots when the T29 (and later IS-6) came into play ;)

Think we just need more time is all :3
They should still make the other Panthers at 5.7
Panther 2 is only good with it's decent mobility, it's not even that fast frankly, T-44-100 outperforms Panther 2 is so many categories, while it's also 7.0
Captain Jed 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 12:22 
引用自 Omega Sirius
引用自 Vriz
You're not alone but to be fair, it was only just a year ago that the playerbase for Germany had to start to learn to aim at weakspots when the T29 (and later IS-6) came into play ;)

Think we just need more time is all :3
They should still make the other Panthers at 5.7
Panther 2 is only good with it's decent mobility, it's not even that fast frankly, T-44-100 outperforms Panther 2 is so many categories, while it's also 7.0

Lets just compare the two:

T-44-100:
Pro -
* Decently armored,
* Amazing 100mm,
* Ok speed,
* Low profile,
Cons -
* Slow
* Reload Speed
* Lack of zoom
* Pennable by aircraft when straffed
* Easier to pen than Panther-2 for most guns and shells
* Good shell costs 300SL to fire, and is a T2 unlock.
* Can't pen stuff at 8.0, reliably at least, stock.
* Prone to fires and 1 shots
- - - -
Panther 2:
Pro -
* Insane speed
* Insane acceleration
* Massively damaging 88
* Better shells stock than 44-100
* 88 APCR isn't rubber either, if you for some reason have a lack of brain cells and fire it
* Rangefinder upgrade
* Insanely good armor layout, practically a 2H with everything better other than slightly worse armor.
* Actually has smoke grenades, unlike the tanks on the rear of the 44-100
* Muzzle velocity is consistent, very hard to miss-aim at any range
* Insanely good zoom, an ACTUAL zoom for the gunsight, not just a slightly zoomed in picture.
* Can frontally pen, outrun everything and compete with everything at 8.0
Cons -
* Large size.
* Somewhat bad turret traverse.
最後修改者:Captain Jed; 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 12:23
Vriz 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 12:24 
引用自 Omega Sirius
引用自 Vriz
You're not alone but to be fair, it was only just a year ago that the playerbase for Germany had to start to learn to aim at weakspots when the T29 (and later IS-6) came into play ;)

Think we just need more time is all :3
They should still make the other Panthers at 5.7
Panther 2 is only good with it's decent mobility, it's not even that fast frankly, T-44-100 outperforms Panther 2 is so many categories, while it's also 7.0
Mmm I think they're fine at 6.0 honestly

Panther II has reload, reverse speed and actual gun depression over the T-44-100. T-44-100 only does so well is because it's own nations have vehicles that heavily support it at that BR range like the super balanced Obj 906 and the IS-3/IS-6 at 7.3
CoreB 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 12:51 
I think they are all pretty good where they are and I regularly take a panther G to 6.7 with my king tiger and it still performs well
Rumpelcrutchskin 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 12:57 
Only reason they pushed Panther II into 7.0 was that they could sell Ru 251. It was perfectly fine at 6.7 and fun tank to play, now at 7.0 it's basicly 100% uptiered into 7.3-7.7 fighting armies of IS-6 and T-54s.
最後修改者:Rumpelcrutchskin; 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 12:57
Vriz 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 1:00 
引用自 Rumpelcrutchskin
Only reason they pushed Panther II into 7.0 was that they could sell Ru 251. It was perfectly fine at 6.7 and fun tank to play, now at 7.0 it's basicly 100% uptiered into 7.3-7.7 fighting armies of T-54s.
That makes zero sense.

Before the Panther II was at 6.7, it used to be at 7.0 when it was just the US. GER and RU tanks ingame. The Panther II still fights T-54s anyway, nothing legitimately changed even when the T-54 1947 used to be at 7.3.

All the uptier did was save the 5.7 allied tanks from the Tiger II / Panther II spam.
Rumpelcrutchskin 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 1:06 
引用自 Vriz
引用自 Rumpelcrutchskin
Only reason they pushed Panther II into 7.0 was that they could sell Ru 251. It was perfectly fine at 6.7 and fun tank to play, now at 7.0 it's basicly 100% uptiered into 7.3-7.7 fighting armies of T-54s.
That makes zero sense.

Before the Panther II was at 6.7, it used to be at 7.0 when it was just the US. GER and RU tanks ingame. The Panther II still fights T-54s anyway, nothing legitimately changed even when the T-54 1947 used to be at 7.3.

All the uptier did was save the 5.7 allied tanks from the Tiger II / Panther II spam.

It may seem so at first glance but even the 0.3 BR increase can get you uptiered lot more then before.

4.3 gets uptiered less then 4.7
5.3 gets uptiered lot less then 5.7.
6.3 gets uptiered lot less then 6.7.
6.7 gets uptiered less then 7.0.
everything from 8.0 or higher gets uptiered into 9.0.
最後修改者:Rumpelcrutchskin; 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 1:08
Vriz 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 1:24 
引用自 Rumpelcrutchskin
引用自 Vriz
That makes zero sense.

Before the Panther II was at 6.7, it used to be at 7.0 when it was just the US. GER and RU tanks ingame. The Panther II still fights T-54s anyway, nothing legitimately changed even when the T-54 1947 used to be at 7.3.

All the uptier did was save the 5.7 allied tanks from the Tiger II / Panther II spam.

It may seem so at first glance but even the 0.3 BR increase can get you uptiered lot more then before.

4.3 gets uptiered less then 4.7
5.3 gets uptiered lot less then 5.7.
6.3 gets uptiered lot less then 6.7.
6.7 gets uptiered less then 7.0.
everything from 8.0 or higher gets uptiered into 9.0.
Sorry but no.

6.7 and 7.0 is a magical black hole where both are equally able to get uptiered into 7.3 / 7.7 games and it has been that way for the last 4 years of Ground Forces. 3000+ hrs of Ground Forces, all 6 nations up to Tier 5. You're trying to debate something that I've grinded through whats basically War Thunder Hell 6 times over.

There's virtually no difference between 6.7 and 7.0 when getting uptiered to 7.3 or 7.7 games. It ain't even debatable. It's still the most populated (not popular) BR spread in the game.
最後修改者:Vriz; 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 1:25
Rumpelcrutchskin 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 1:31 
You got to also look the bottom line not just upper line, from my experience 6.7 gets uptiered less then 7.0 because the bottom line goes into very popular 5.7 so you have more chance of getting tanks from there in the team.
With 7.0 the bottom line goes into 6.0 that not that many people play compared to 5.7, that's why you have more chance of going up.
Bottom line all I know really is that I was doing much better with Panther II when it was 6.7 then with current 7.0.
Omega Sirius 2018 年 1 月 5 日 上午 1:32 
引用自 Vriz
引用自 Omega Sirius
They should still make the other Panthers at 5.7
Panther 2 is only good with it's decent mobility, it's not even that fast frankly, T-44-100 outperforms Panther 2 is so many categories, while it's also 7.0
Mmm I think they're fine at 6.0 honestly

Panther II has reload, reverse speed and actual gun depression over the T-44-100. T-44-100 only does so well is because it's own nations have vehicles that heavily support it at that BR range like the super balanced Obj 906 and the IS-3/IS-6 at 7.3
FYI, I'd rather bring out my Tiger 1 at 6.0, than these Panthers. Tiger does much better than the Panther.
< >
目前顯示第 1-15 則留言,共 42
每頁顯示: 1530 50

張貼日期: 2018 年 1 月 4 日 下午 11:22
回覆: 42