Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
But with both being free, just try them and see what you like best. WT is generally harder to get into though and takes time to learn, but there are lots of people willing to help on fourms for both games.
Both games are different.
WOT had actual artillery, this game does not.
This game has aircraft mixed with tanks, that game does not (along with stuff like anti air vehicles)
Both games have modules/components of a tanks however in this game there's more and you see how the ammo affects the types of compononts and exactly where they are.
Albeit bushes is right that they have more non-existant tanks but then again, they also have more tanks in general compared to this game. So while they do have "paper tanks" much like this game, they simply have more tanks overall.
Also this game has 3 modes, arcade where tanks move at high speeds and you get aim assist and name/tank tags much like WOT and a spotting system but no health bars. Generally to kill a tank here you need to either make the ammo explode or kill all the crew.
Try both games since they're both free and see which you like more.
World of Tanks is more of an arcade version of War Thunder.
My advise: Try both! You'll figure out what's right for you.
No records on WT.
Hilarious.
This is obvious bait.
You're entitled to your opinion, but I, and many others would disagree that this game is bad.
Both games rely heavily on skill and knowledge of game mechanics.
If you enjoy numbers-games, RNJesus, and all of the nitty-gritty of spotting mechanics, WOT is probably the game for you. It's more of an arcade style.
If you enjoy realistic damage models, primarily historic vehicles, and "realism", then War Thunder is probably the game for you.
Having played both: Personally, I don't enjoy RNG. If I hit someone in the ammo rack, I want it to kill them, not take off 10% of their health bar, and then get blown to the moon and back when I get "lit up" for all of the enemy team to see.
In my experience, the WoT playerbase seems to be younger, and more toxic. I'm not saying that as a jab or because "I work for Gaijin so I must bad-mouth the competition!"; no. This is just my honest opinion. War Thunder has a few toxic players as well, but it's a smaller community, and hence easier to deal with.
I tried WOT awhile back and I ran into the same problems as you. It sucks practically memorizing the internals of a vehicle through WT and then encountering it in WOT and even if you aim for engines and ammo racks you have a small chance of hurting that module and an even smaller one with destroying it.