Who is the best player ?

[Razupaltuf]

I want to compare my stats with you =)

http://warthunder.com/en/infograf/?uid=26951697
http://store.steampowered.com

[NAF-5th.Legion-Waffen.Div]

Originally posted by Bogey:

Originally posted by Serpent90:

Well, on thunderskill you're better than OP:
http://thunderskill.com/en/stat/VinLP

I don't know how it counts, but I do believe that thunderskill puts a high emphasis on w/ratio.
This might be counting scores, which is apples and oranges. (I don't know how many times I killed all incoming targets so that my team mates could get the cap unhindered, no points for capping though...)
And silver lions in a world where the number you get is dependent on if you drive a premium, have a premium account or boosters is largely irrelevant.

I wouldn't put much trust in warthunder.com ... I've been playing worse lately (excuses, excuses, British tanks), still my ranking is increasing. And I've looked around a bit, it seems that anyone who has played a few hundred games or more is ranked at least a very good player.

I think the most reliable sources we have is the in game values for winrate and the average relative position in the team.

agreed,i think the best source is thunderskill too.cause the one on warthunder.com is comparing someones RB performance to someone elses AB performance dosnt give a precise comparisson.

[Bogey]

Originally posted by NAFdeadmike:

Originally posted by Bogey:

I wouldn't put much trust in warthunder.com ... I've been playing worse lately (excuses, excuses, British tanks), still my ranking is increasing. And I've looked around a bit, it seems that anyone who has played a few hundred games or more is ranked at least a very good player.

I think the most reliable sources we have is the in game values for winrate and the average relative position in the team.

agreed,i think the best source is thunderskill too.cause the one on warthunder.com is comparing someones RB performance to someone elses AB performance dosnt give a precise comparisson.

well, i did mean thunderskill.com, as you know very well I'm sure ...

Any average pleb can get a good ranking at thunderskill.com, as I'm proof of myself ...

[OldMemes.biz]

That link doesn't work. How do you get to just where you search yourself

[Serpent90]

http://warthunder.com/en/infograf/
While logged into the thing.

[OldMemes.biz]

Thank you Serpent

[NAF-5th.Legion-Waffen.Div]

Originally posted by Bogey:

Originally posted by NAFdeadmike:

agreed,i think the best source is thunderskill too.cause the one on warthunder.com is comparing someones RB performance to someone elses AB performance dosnt give a precise comparisson.

well, i did mean thunderskill.com, as you know very well I'm sure ...

Any average pleb can get a good ranking at thunderskill.com, as I'm proof of myself ...

http://thunderskill.com/en/stat/Bogey079 ok.
but still,this http://warthunder.com/en/infograf/
dosnt give something you can compare to anyones elses,because,its dosnt seperate gamemodes,it compares someones AB performance to someone elses RB performance,you cant compare anything based on that.

[OldMemes.biz]

lol, ThunderSkill says 63% in AB is "Excellent," while 68% in RB is just "Very Good." lol ThunderSkill knows what's up!

http://thunderskill.com/en/stat/Dark_Horse_83

[NAF-5th.Legion-Waffen.Div]

Originally posted by Results Not Typical:

lol, ThunderSkill says 63% in AB is "Excellent," while 68% in RB is just "Very Good." lol ThunderSkill knows what's up!

http://thunderskill.com/en/stat/Dark_Horse_83

it says 49% AB bad player, 68% RB good player 55% SB average player
where do you see AB 63% excelent?? in RB you need higher effeciency to be rated as excelent than you do in AB.

[OldMemes.biz]

Originally posted by NAFdeadmike:

Originally posted by Results Not Typical:

lol, ThunderSkill says 63% in AB is "Excellent," while 68% in RB is just "Very Good." lol ThunderSkill knows what's up!

http://thunderskill.com/en/stat/Dark_Horse_83

it says 49% AB bad player, 68% RB good player 55% SB average player
where do you see AB 63% excelent??

Bogey's. Bogey's 63 AB is "Excellent."

And if I actually played AB anymore I could fix that 49 REAL quick lol but I won't play AB.


Anyway my point was ThunderSkill seems to be programmed to expect more of an RB player over an AB player :P

[NAF-5th.Legion-Waffen.Div]

Originally posted by Results Not Typical:

Originally posted by NAFdeadmike:

it says 49% AB bad player, 68% RB good player 55% SB average player
where do you see AB 63% excelent??

Bogey's. Bogey's 63 AB is "Excellent."

in RB you need higher effeciency to be rated as excelent than you do in AB.
and even higher for SB i believe

[OldMemes.biz]

Originally posted by Results Not Typical:

Anyway my point was ThunderSkill seems to be programmed to expect more of an RB player over an AB player :P

[NAF-5th.Legion-Waffen.Div]

Originally posted by Results Not Typical:

Originally posted by Results Not Typical:

Anyway my point was ThunderSkill seems to be programmed to expect more of an RB player over an AB player :P

yes exactly,in AB you need above 60% to be rated excelent, in RB you have to be over 70%

[OldMemes.biz]

As it should, haha

[Serpent90]

Originally posted by Results Not Typical:

lol, ThunderSkill says 63% in AB is "Excellent," while 68% in RB is just "Very Good." lol ThunderSkill knows what's up!

http://thunderskill.com/en/stat/Dark_Horse_83

I think it's due to the fact that they use the same algorithm to get efficiency across all game modes.
Then it's separated depending on how much population there is at a given level.
http://thunderskill.com/en/stat
In AB, the top, let's say 10% of players have a lower efficiency that the efficiency of the top 10% players in RB.
Comparing efficiency accross game modes is apples and oranges, the meta is different. (and so is comparing those who play mostly planes and mostly ground, they should separate these imo)

[OldMemes.biz]

no one cares dude