M4 Skink anti-aircraft please

[pinbuck]

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-WXjJs5QEkJY/UNM1fvE7XyI/AAAAAAAAIwU/-JlRSSilvEg/s1600/drawing.png

[meowter death]

That actually looks pretty interesting.

[pinbuck]

yes

[Bluejay0013]

the only problem is, there was only three made in existence. So there is no real way of telling the specs on the tank.

[M1 Garand]

Messaggio originale di bluejay0013:

the only problem is, there was only three made in existence. So there is no real way of telling the specs on the tank.

It was made using and already existing vehicle and weapons, 4 20mm oerlikons on an M4A1 Sherman chassis, the only thing difficult to figure out on it would be turret thickness, but I imagine it would be not too far off from the regular M4A1's turret.

That aside I have been wanting this thing for months for the British AA tree, most of their AA is not very good, nor do they carry much ammo.

[Katokevin]

Messaggio originale di M1 Garand:

Messaggio originale di bluejay0013:

the only problem is, there was only three made in existence. So there is no real way of telling the specs on the tank.

*snip*

That aside I have been wanting this thing for months for the British AA tree, most of their AA is not very good, nor do they carry much ammo.

*Put a 40mm Bofors on a Crusader, only packs the turret with ammo.*

British tank designing at its finest.

[pinbuck]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skink_anti-aircraft_tank
http://www.warfare.altervista.org/Canada/skink-aa.htm
https://www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryPorn/comments/44wqbb/wwiiera_canadian_skink_antiaircraft_tank_based_on/
some stuff about it that i found
warthunder developement team needs some rough guesses with relativity to balancing

[Donovar]

Should be in the American tech tree at least the brits have 20mm aa tanksthe US is stuck with either .50s or 40mms

[CoreB]

Messaggio originale di bluejay0013:

the only problem is, there was only three made in existence. So there is no real way of telling the specs on the tank.

They did it with the Falcon which never left the drawing board

[Donovar]

Messaggio originale di CoreB:

Messaggio originale di bluejay0013:

the only problem is, there was only three made in existence. So there is no real way of telling the specs on the tank.

They did it with the Falcon which never left the drawing board

and KT105

[Azi]

Messaggio originale di Donovar:

Messaggio originale di CoreB:

They did it with the Falcon which never left the drawing board

and KT105

And Coelian

[Donovar]

Messaggio originale di Azarias-12:

Messaggio originale di Donovar:

and KT105

And Coelian

jsut an assload of paper vehics in general

[Azi]

Messaggio originale di Donovar:

Messaggio originale di Azarias-12:

And Coelian

jsut an assload of paper vehics in general

Let's not forget the T-series of American that are prototypes only...

[Donovar]

Messaggio originale di Azarias-12:

Messaggio originale di Donovar:

jsut an assload of paper vehics in general

Let's not forget the T-series of American that are prototypes only...

at least they existed unlike some things

[CoreB]

Messaggio originale di Donovar:

Messaggio originale di CoreB:

They did it with the Falcon which never left the drawing board

and KT105

Yea but I suppose they already had the data and armour values for the KT already so that's not as bad

[Katokevin]

Messaggio originale di CoreB:

Messaggio originale di bluejay0013:

the only problem is, there was only three made in existence. So there is no real way of telling the specs on the tank.

They did it with the Falcon which never left the drawing board

To be fair, at least 1 was built (but thats it due to the limited ammo issue).

http://ciar.org/ttk/mbt/afv_weapons_profile_pack/afv_weapons_profile_51__abbot_fv433_self_propelled_gun.pdf

Go down to page 19 and you will find 4 pictures of it, 1 of them even durring firing.

Edit: It was only one built as a prototype.