Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I like the Ki-44s, Ki-43s, A6Ms, Ki-61s, Ki-100s and the A7Ms.
Its only real weak points are bad energy retention (because it weighs as much as a leaf) and poor survivability. These are barely weak points though. A good thunderbolt pilot will be able to abuse your poor energy retention maybe... but how often does one of those come along?
My go-to plane is the Ki-44-II. I love it in RB because it climbs and dives fast and seems to retain enough of its energy to where I don't typically get caught out without speed. It'll climb fast without WEP once it's high enough. It'll climb with WEP and won't over-heat once it's over 4K in altitude. It's guns aren't strong but can be very accurate since they're nose-mounted. Also, it carries enough ammo to get me at least three kills before I've to land (I'm still getting used to aiming in RB). I like the fact that in RB, the -44-II is ate BR 3.7, so I won't get matched up with extremely good planes. I typically see P-63s, P-40s, P-51s, and P-38s. I never have a problem getting my kills and don't typically get shot down in this plane. The only problems I have are in making my ammo last and landing on carriers (I crash every time).
I've also flown the Ki-61s (2.3 BR), solely for the massive amounts of ammo they carry, but they don't climb well.
In AB, I use the A7M2, both the Ki-100s, and now the Ki-84 (ko). The A7M2 is nasty, in a very good way. It's my favorite. The Ki-100s are less so, because they aren't fast...if you're not careful, you can get run down. Same with the Ki-84, but the Ki-84 can turn very well.
I refuse to go above BR 5.0 with Japan, though. Their planes are already doused in gasoline awaiting to catch fire...no need to welcome slaughter by going above BR 5.0, IMO.
Did the last person to reply say that they are using japanese planes because their wings are LEAST likely to break?
Isn't the opposite true? I love japanese planes, but structural resilience is not one of their notable attributes.