Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
b) He's reloading.
c) His gun is jammed.
d) The enemy are coming in from a blind spot so the gunner can't actually shoot at the them (for example directly behind, just below, or from a really steep angle from above). The Ju-87 gunner doesn't really have the best range of movement for his gun.
On the Ju-57 d) is very likely, the Ju-87 gunner only has a really small arc of fire.
Shame on you Wartthunder!
They finaly fixed the D variants gunner though so it can now shoot below the tail like on the B variants.
500 tanks is highly debatable.
And no, this is not a flaw.
Stukas defenses relied heavily on large formations of typicaly 15 aicraft. Small formations or single planes generaly had to outmanuever attackers to survive.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McloM9Es3oM
EDIT: Also forgot to mention air superiority and escort. And all fronts, the aircraft was devasting when it had air superiority but became quite easy pray once it was lost (look at the battle of britain for example or during the soviet counterattack in late 1942)
Explain please?
My issue however is not the Rudel legacy but the game mechanics. I think that a rear gunner must serve some purpose. At the moment the JU-87 rear gunner is just fairly useless.
Firstly, if you are saying that facts matter, can you give me a source for your claims?
And no, the gunner on the ju87 is not useless. The main issue with is with the aircrafts performance itself. I've gotten countless kills with the gunner on the d variants and i spent almost 2 months straight playing it in rb, destroying over 1,100 ground units with the B variant. If you play your cards, you can do very well.
https://m.imgur.com/4hRNq3o?r
It doesn't matter that Rudel was credited with the destruction if 519 tanks, the Ju-87 D is pretty much correctly modelled in the game, and you're probably no Rudel yourself. If the enemy is attacking from your gunners blind spot then he can't shoot at him.
Congratulations, you just copy and paste from Wikipedia. I hope you feel accomplished in nothingness.
In any case, Erich Hartmann, Hiroyoshi Nishizawa, and Richard Bong where probably better pilots anyway.
You just copy and pasted a quoye from wikipedia. Notice that there are no sources linked to that. That is not a source.
Also, being credited with x amount of "kills" doesn't mean you actualy "killed" that many tanks. Whats the deffinition of a tank kill? Rudel could have shot a tank, hit it, only for it to be repaired a few hours later and back into action. Add to this too that all nations exagerated their "kills" during operation barborossa and throughout the war for propaganda. You can also get into the fact that Rudel was actualy a very poor pilot during training.
For the record, i am not denying or accepting these figures, its entirely possible that rudel could have "killed" those 500 tanks, but you should take them in with a healthy dose of skepticism.
Here's a good video that goes into a bit more detail: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FabtgOlyhMY