War Thunder

War Thunder

View Stats:
Foxtrot39 Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:11pm
Ba-349 Natter
How fun ya think it could be?
< >
Showing 1-13 of 13 comments
Donatedelk Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:15pm 
Considering the craziness? Oh yeah.
Illusionyary Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:15pm 
I'm not sure how well it'd work given it was armed only with rockets... reminds me of the Mizuno Shinryu.
Foxtrot39 Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:20pm 
Well its was either 2 different rocket layout or 2x30mm Mk108 with 30 shot each


Originally posted by Illusionyary:
I'm not sure how well it'd work given it was armed only with rockets... reminds me of the Mizuno Shinryu.


Difference being its not supposed to land at all, plane seperate in 2 part and engine is parachuted to be re-used
Last edited by Foxtrot39; Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:24pm
Donatedelk Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:24pm 
Originally posted by Illusionyary:
I'm not sure how well it'd work given it was armed only with rockets... reminds me of the Mizuno Shinryu.
Well, there is the Ar-234 which only has bombs, maybe it could work...
Frobro Swagginz Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:49pm 
Not a lot of play time, and when out of fuel and ammo you'd have to fly back to base and "j out" over it (only way that makes sence to me). But that being said, would be pretty fun in ground forces especially to quickly go after bombers and ground forces (even though that's not what they were designed for). VERY narrow role they would have, and would pretty much only work on very small maps (luckily ground forces maps are all small), but still fun though imo
Charmander787 Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:52pm 
Its legit a rocket lmao

Just a rocket.

it could be good in around 6.3/6.7 BR ranges
Last edited by Charmander787; Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:52pm
Frobro Swagginz Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:58pm 
Originally posted by Ratatoskr:
Its legit a rocket lmao

Just a rocket.

it could be good in around 6.3/6.7 BR ranges
Except that at those battle ratings, the maps (for air) are generally pretty big, and it's kinda hard to play in a map that big when you only have about 3min of fuel...
Donatedelk Jan 25, 2017 @ 7:03pm 
i mean, there is the Me 163, I think the real life fuel limit was only 5 minutes, in game it is seven, maybe an air spawn kinda jet though. glide down to the target, hit it and run away like there is no tomorrow.
Frobro Swagginz Jan 25, 2017 @ 7:15pm 
Originally posted by donatedelk:
i mean, there is the Me 163, I think the real life fuel limit was only 5 minutes, in game it is seven, maybe an air spawn kinda jet though. glide down to the target, hit it and run away like there is no tomorrow.
The endurance of the Messerschmitt 163 in-game is about right actually. Also, giving it an airspawn would kill probably the coolest thing about the plane; it's take-off! It took off like an actual rocket, off a ramp and then flew 90deg vertically and reaching just over 6,000ft within the first 10sec of it's flight (at 10sec is where the aux rockets run out of fuel and thus thus jettisoned, resulting in a lower climbrate due to lost power). How cool would that be, taking off like no other aircraft in WT. The t/o alone would be the sweetest thing about the plane.
captain gimmick Jan 25, 2017 @ 7:35pm 
The Natter did not need a runway to take off, any open area would do. Maybe they could simulate this by having it take off about half way between the teams? Maybe this could make its low fuel more bearable aswell.
Frobro Swagginz Jan 25, 2017 @ 7:38pm 
Originally posted by zergling66:
The Natter did not need a runway to take off, any open area would do. Maybe they could simulate this by having it take off about half way between the teams? Maybe this could make its low fuel more bearable aswell.
not very realistic to t/o in territory that isn't friendly, but a lot of things aren't realsit in this game so ya sure
Donatedelk Jan 26, 2017 @ 3:14am 
Originally posted by Frobro Swagginz:
Originally posted by donatedelk:
i mean, there is the Me 163, I think the real life fuel limit was only 5 minutes, in game it is seven, maybe an air spawn kinda jet though. glide down to the target, hit it and run away like there is no tomorrow.
The endurance of the Messerschmitt 163 in-game is about right actually. Also, giving it an airspawn would kill probably the coolest thing about the plane; it's take-off! It took off like an actual rocket, off a ramp and then flew 90deg vertically and reaching just over 6,000ft within the first 10sec of it's flight (at 10sec is where the aux rockets run out of fuel and thus thus jettisoned, resulting in a lower climbrate due to lost power). How cool would that be, taking off like no other aircraft in WT. The t/o alone would be the sweetest thing about the plane.
Yeah true. Hmm. I just don't know how it will be able to do what it's suppose to do in game without starting it somewhere other than the actual airfield
Frobro Swagginz Jan 26, 2017 @ 12:28pm 
Originally posted by donatedelk:
Originally posted by Frobro Swagginz:
The endurance of the Messerschmitt 163 in-game is about right actually. Also, giving it an airspawn would kill probably the coolest thing about the plane; it's take-off! It took off like an actual rocket, off a ramp and then flew 90deg vertically and reaching just over 6,000ft within the first 10sec of it's flight (at 10sec is where the aux rockets run out of fuel and thus thus jettisoned, resulting in a lower climbrate due to lost power). How cool would that be, taking off like no other aircraft in WT. The t/o alone would be the sweetest thing about the plane.
Yeah true. Hmm. I just don't know how it will be able to do what it's suppose to do in game without starting it somewhere other than the actual airfield
well as that other guy pointed out, the t/o ramp doesn't gave to be placed at the airfield, it could be someone further up closer to the neutral point in the map
< >
Showing 1-13 of 13 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jan 25, 2017 @ 6:11pm
Posts: 13