Tiger II - A massive dissapointment.

[FierceTomato]

Don't waste your time with the King Tiger.


The armor is useless, and the gun is ♥♥♥♥.

Just got your new King Tiger? Guess what. Get ready to get penned from your turret mantlet by light US cold war era tanks. Get ready to bounce 80% of your shells at anything you shoot at.

Want to snipe? TOO BAD! 9/10 times you get a city map! Have fun!

[captain gimmick]

Publicado originalmente por 请善待小学生:

In the previous version, King Tiger is f**kin usefull, my kd of TigerII H and sla is 4+. And then the A-hole Rus Game Maker added IS-6 and T34(US) to the game but just added one ru251. What an ALLIES game! Gaijin, f**k you and well done! This game is really balance in 6.7 LOLLOLLOLLOL. F**k Gaijin, GO SUCK STALIN‘S ♥♥♥♥!

You think T34 is better then the King Tiger?


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Worse gun, worse reload, larger, harder to get, barely better turret armor that still can be penned by the long 88, much much much worse hull armor. Only thing it has better is a miniscule advantage in speed, better turret armor, and with the APCR shell it is better at killing things without much slope.

[Artoras]

i have palyed russia and japan to 7.0 used britain to 8 br and germany to 6.7 and the tiger 2 is one the best tanks at it br. first time i saw and is6 was in the tiger 2 sla and i killed from the front the t 29/34 the same and for city maps the tigers not that bad try a british tank the tiger is no longer the absolute king but by no means is it week

[Field Marshall Arby]

Hey Tree, fun fact about that "shaking turret" tactic: it doesnt always work. Ive tried. And also, where did i exactly said did i want the king tiger to be like the IS-6? All i wanted from this game was to be historical (without it becoming a slaughter house).

[captain gimmick]

Publicado originalmente por Field Marshall Arby:

Hey Tree, fun fact about that "shaking turret" tactic: it doesnt always work. Ive tried. And also, where did i exactly said did i want the king tiger to be like the IS-6? All i wanted from this game was to be historical (without it becoming a slaughter house).

How would you make it historical without having it becoming a slaughter house?

[M1 Garand]

Publicado originalmente por Field Marshall Arby:

Hey Tree, fun fact about that "shaking turret" tactic: it doesnt always work. Ive tried. And also, where did i exactly said did i want the king tiger to be like the IS-6? All i wanted from this game was to be historical (without it becoming a slaughter house).

It can't be historical without it being a slaughter house, you would be fighting nothing but T-34-85's, Sherman's of various models, M10's, M18's, M36's, M26's, Cromwells, and so on. These are all tanks that struggle to fight Tiger II H's. The only tank you would face that would give you a run for your money would be the IS-2-44 and even then you can stomp the ♥♥♥♥ out of it.

[Field Marshall Arby]

Publicado originalmente por wait I can change this?!?:

Publicado originalmente por 请善待小学生:

In the previous version, King Tiger is f**kin usefull, my kd of TigerII H and sla is 4+. And then the A-hole Rus Game Maker added IS-6 and T34(US) to the game but just added one ru251. What an ALLIES game! Gaijin, f**k you and well done! This game is really balance in 6.7 LOLLOLLOLLOL. F**k Gaijin, GO SUCK STALIN‘S ♥♥♥♥!

You think T34 is better then the King Tiger?


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Worse gun, worse reload, larger, harder to get, barely better turret armor that still can be penned by the long 88, much much much worse hull armor. Only thing it has better is a miniscule advantage in speed, better turret armor, and with the APCR shell it is better at killing things without much slope.

That thing is by far not inferior to the king tiger. It has weaker armor, yes, but thanks to its low hull, it can hide it better. And the lower plate can be trolly. Also, i have been penned by this things gun at ranges beyond 1500m in my lower plate.

[Vriz]

Publicado originalmente por wait I can change this?!?:

Publicado originalmente por Field Marshall Arby:

Hey Tree, fun fact about that "shaking turret" tactic: it doesnt always work. Ive tried. And also, where did i exactly said did i want the king tiger to be like the IS-6? All i wanted from this game was to be historical (without it becoming a slaughter house).

How would you make it historical without having it becoming a slaughter house?

And thats the issue about Historical matchups, either you get swarmed because numbers > quality or you have limited but unfair matchups like we have for the Chronicles event right now with 75mm Shermans vs Tigers and Panthers

[captain gimmick]

Publicado originalmente por M1 Garand:

Publicado originalmente por Field Marshall Arby:

Hey Tree, fun fact about that "shaking turret" tactic: it doesnt always work. Ive tried. And also, where did i exactly said did i want the king tiger to be like the IS-6? All i wanted from this game was to be historical (without it becoming a slaughter house).

It can't be historical without it being a slaughter house, you would be fighting nothing but T-34-85's, Sherman's of various models, M10's, M18's, M36's, M26's, Cromwells, and so on. These are all tanks that struggle to fight Tiger II H's. The only tank you would face that would give you a run for your money would be the IS-2-44 and even then you can stomp the ♥♥♥♥ out of it.

Maybe if they gave the Allies roving bands of P-47, made it so that every time a Tiger moves there is a 50% chance it broke down, then it could be both realistic and balanced!

[Field Marshall Arby]

If you limit the number of king tigers in a game like that to, 2 to 3 max. Then i would not be a massive problem (Kursk would be the big issue).

[M1 Garand]

Publicado originalmente por Field Marshall Arby:

If you limit the number of king tigers in a game like that to, 2 to 3 max. Then i would not be a massive problem (Kursk would be the big issue).

Then the queue time would be 5 hours because every German play and their mother would be trying to use the Tiger II to club.

[Field Marshall Arby]

Publicado originalmente por M1 Garand:

Publicado originalmente por Field Marshall Arby:

Hey Tree, fun fact about that "shaking turret" tactic: it doesnt always work. Ive tried. And also, where did i exactly said did i want the king tiger to be like the IS-6? All i wanted from this game was to be historical (without it becoming a slaughter house).

It can't be historical without it being a slaughter house, you would be fighting nothing but T-34-85's, Sherman's of various models, M10's, M18's, M36's, M26's, Cromwells, and so on. These are all tanks that struggle to fight Tiger II H's. The only tank you would face that would give you a run for your money would be the IS-2-44 and even then you can stomp the ♥♥♥♥ out of it.

And yet is it too hard for a gaming company to at LEAST try to make it realistic? Plus, limit their numbers in-game and incourage players to play more tigers and panthers. And/or make their repairs cost more.

[Field Marshall Arby]

Publicado originalmente por M1 Garand:

Publicado originalmente por Field Marshall Arby:

If you limit the number of king tigers in a game like that to, 2 to 3 max. Then i would not be a massive problem (Kursk would be the big issue).

Then the queue time would be 5 hours because every German play and their mother would be trying to use the Tiger II to club.

At first yes, but they will get tired of waiting and leaving to go play their tigers ,panthers, so forth and which will increase the variety of german vehicles in-game instead of tiger II spam.

[Vriz]

Publicado originalmente por Field Marshall Arby:

Publicado originalmente por M1 Garand:

Then the queue time would be 5 hours because every German play and their mother would be trying to use the Tiger II to club.

At first yes, but they will get tired of waiting and leaving to go play their tigers ,panthers, so forth and which will increase the variety of german vehicles in-game instead of tiger II spam.

They wont. Its not going to work lol, people will rather wait than to play a subpar tank. That sort of optimistic thinking is sadly devoid of nearly 4 years worth of playing tanks...

[Field Marshall Arby]

Publicado originalmente por Vriz:

Publicado originalmente por Field Marshall Arby:

At first yes, but they will get tired of waiting and leaving to go play their tigers ,panthers, so forth and which will increase the variety of german vehicles in-game instead of tiger II spam.

They wont. Its not going to work lol, people will rather wait than to play a subpar tank. That sort of optimistic thinking is sadly devoid of nearly 4 years worth of playing tanks...

Given enough time, they will. People usually have very little patience. And i would like to seem them try...

[Vriz]

Publicado originalmente por Field Marshall Arby:

Publicado originalmente por Vriz:

They wont. Its not going to work lol, people will rather wait than to play a subpar tank. That sort of optimistic thinking is sadly devoid of nearly 4 years worth of playing tanks...

Given enough time, they will. People usually have very little patience. And i would like to seem them try...

See, that's the thing.




They'll just leave the game instead.