Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
really depends on how much demand they see in the people buying them, doesn't it?
I agree. Back when we had 3 map/2 weapon dlc's they were a no brainer. The alternating between free patches, even though they were nowhere near as large were still cool. The skins have different shades so they look off with most of the helms.
He mean to use cheats to get that skins.
Cheating to win at a game is one thing, but cheating to get the skins that cost $$ is stealing.
If there system is not secure enough to allow in game skin changing at the risk of loosing $$ then they need to fix that asap.
NO, he mean that if they add skins as part of loot table/inventory in any way - it would be possible to obtain it via cheats, thats one of reasons why we have that clumsy skin system that we have now. And he assumed, that if devs would see that skins have high demand - they would bother to add NEW system, that have not tied to any of current one, to make it safe from stealing.