Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"You've got it all wrong" vs "One thing on one weapon is 'wrong'"
Very good detail ! I look this up and true. Wow! TWI is read forum, so can maybe read. TWI is best and is always try hard for us.
Thank you for so much knowledge.
That's why they changed the rate of fire as well as the accuracy of the gun accordingly, so why not it's visual characteristics?
BTW here's a video how it looks like:
https://youtu.be/rzryxgMLn38
OP, ya did good.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1576340604
If you are going to try to big-brain about errors with guns, for the love of god at least be correct in your terminology.
That said, the flash isn't correct, but, uh, really not a big deal.
Going to do some in-game checking, and then edit with findings.
*EDIT*
Yeah most guns do appear to have at least similar to correct flash (from first person at any rate).
Easy method if TW feels lazy but decides to fix the flash on the Tommy would be to use the deagle's existing flash. It throws it upward the way a cutts compensator would, and while not completely correct, would be a lot closer than what we have ATM.
Yeah, I was lazy a bit, I admit it. :)
I love guns as much as the next guy, and pay great attention to weapons in games even while I'm playing, and even I don't care about something like this that much at all.
Regardless of if it was manufactured recently, there is very clearly a Cutts compensator on the weapon and no matter how freshly manufactured it is, it'll always have the same flash pattern.
As well, even if it's a replica it's specifically a replica of a Thompson M1928 given it has a vertical forgegrip and drum magazine.
This, however, is not laziness, it's just not noticeable enough to anyone to matter to any realy degree.
I really don't understand why you'd waste time throwing criticism at every tiny little detail like this, when there's plenty to actually criticize that's tangible and justifiable to do so.
Because TWI profess to be 'gun nuts' and take pride on their gun models? Because the art team isn't the same as the programmers, and therefore won't detract from 'tangible and justifiable' problems? Trying to use a fallacy of relative privation when its not even the same people working on it is pretty low. Trying to say noone will notice it when the OP obviously did is also fallicious.
The muzzle flash is wrong. That's a fact. You don't have to get angry about it. Just accept that it is what it is.