Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's true. Risk vs Reward.
personally im pro the gambling, but i feel you can also make an argument for bosses not being gambling because you have no real way of knowing how to even do the fight unless you forcibly gamble forward.
Valid point but gambling forward is also the only way to continue to progress, unless someone wants to run the same easy mission over and over.
The pacing is fine. Its way better than previous games.
There are valid criticisms on this board but there are also a lot from people who just want an easy ride so they can one and done the game and then complain there isn't enough content.
I'm not looking for an easy grind but I also have a life and can't dedicated 1000 hours to this game just to be OP. Nothing wrong with tweaking progression to make it a bit easier.
"we" You're playing co-op, I'm talking solo experience.
That's fine. They're looking for feedback, I'm providing my perspectives. They may not be the same as yours and that's okay. It's entirely possible to tweak things to make it a bit less frustrating for some players while having little to no impact on the diehards.