Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
ooo you should check out Mike Aben...
In the long run, I warmed up to Scott Manley. His accent is super annoying and he tends to blather, but he made the tutorials that actually allowed ME to build the spaceships and do the maneuvers and missions that I wanted to do. Matt Lowne is producing more with the intent of entertainment (very exotic missions) while Scott seems to put more emphasis on creating educational (starter) content that you can build upon gameplay wise.
The more I watched Matt Lowne, the more annoying he became. He seems to feel the need to fill every second of (gameplay) video with commentary, no matter how unnecessary or bad the commentary is. He also speaks like a chipmunk on cocaine (very fast and with a high pitch) and I personally can't relax while listening to it. I just wish that he would use music more and talk less ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Scott Manley wins in the long run as far as I am concerned, because his docking tutorial video alone helped me more than any of Matt Lowne's videos.
Both are awesome though, don't get me wrong. I couldn't do most of the missions that these guys are able to do, because of how much time they put into their content and how much of the physics and the game they understand.